On Fri 1 Nov 2019 at 21:37, Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> Pass 1:
> https://github.com/apache/maven-site/compare/master...elharo:patch-34
>
> This might not be accurate. In particular I am assuming that if there
> are two requirements for [1.0,2.0] and (3.0,5.0) that something will
> be picked.
Pass 1: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/compare/master...elharo:patch-34
This might not be accurate. In particular I am assuming that if there
are two requirements for [1.0,2.0] and (3.0,5.0) that something will
be picked. This might not be accurate. If this instead fails the
build, please le
0: from me.
The reason is that we did not reach the consensus that we would also have
the benefits when the sources in Maven Core would be converted to J8
including performed some performance tests.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:11 PM Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> based on the discusio
Hi,
tested. +1 from me.
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 29.10.19 23:10, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Hi,
We solved 9 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317220&version=12344773&styleName=Text
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
+1
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 10:11 PM Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> based on the discusion this is the formal VOTE to lift the minimum of
> Maven Core with version 3.7.0 to JDK 8 minimum.
>
> Vote open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1
>
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Hei
Hi,
so I just updated the versions of the 3 plugins and gave the Apache PLC4X build
a little spin ...
https://github.com/apache/plc4x/tree/feature/reproducible-builds
Did two executions of this:
mvn -U -P
with-boost,with-java,with-dotnet,with-cpp,with-python,with-proxies,with-sandbox,with
-Da
please provide an example of a visible issue so we can work on it
Regards,
Hervé
Le vendredi 1 novembre 2019, 10:27:36 CET Vladimir Sitnikov a écrit :
> OpenJDK8 uses hashmap for manifest entries, so jar files are not really
> reproducible there.
>
> Note: there's run-to-run randomization in j.
Le vendredi 1 novembre 2019, 09:40:40 CET Christofer Dutz a écrit :
> Hi Herve,
>
> thanks for that will try it asap and report any findings back.
>
> But good to know that there is a difference between JDK major versions and
> OSes ... so it would probably be best to stage releases on Linux with
OpenJDK8 uses hashmap for manifest entries, so jar files are not really
reproducible there.
Note: there's run-to-run randomization in j.u.HashMap, so the manifest
contents is not predictable.
Vladimir
Hi Herve,
thanks for that will try it asap and report any findings back.
But good to know that there is a difference between JDK major versions and OSes
... so it would probably be best to stage releases on Linux with an OpenJDK of
the minimum supported version?
Just thinking how to make it pos
here is my +1
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 29 octobre 2019, 22:44:17 CET Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 2 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317924&&v
> ersion=12345522&styleName=Text
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/re
Here is my +1
Sylwester
pt., 1 lis 2019, 09:26 użytkownik Hervé BOUTEMY
napisał:
> Hi,
>
> I need some votes on this one, in addition to the 2 others :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le mardi 29 octobre 2019, 23:10:46 CET Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 9 issues:
> >
> https://is
here is my +1
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 29 octobre 2019, 22:55:56 CET Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 1 issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317526&ve
> rsion=12345503&styleName=Text
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repo
Hi,
I need some votes on this one, in addition to the 2 others :)
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 29 octobre 2019, 23:10:46 CET Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 9 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317220&ve
> rsion=12344773&styleName=Text
>
> Stag
hi,
Any update on this please? Is this mail group actively monitored? or should
I raise a pull request directly to the project?
Max
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 6:12 PM Max Zhu wrote:
> For what's worth I am talking about maven-javadoc-plugin (just realized
> this is the main maven mail group)
>
>
Le jeudi 31 octobre 2019, 17:26:52 CET Christofer Dutz a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> as I can see you're voting on releasing the reproducible build extended
> plugin versions.
Is there any documentation on how to use this new
> feature?
>
> I had a look at the confluence page, but that seemed like a b
+1
Sylwester
czw., 31 paź 2019, 18:40 użytkownik Karl Heinz Marbaise
napisał:
> Hi Hervé,
>
> tested with serveral maven versions etc.
>
> Just fine.
>
> So +1 from me.
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
> On 29.10.19 22:55, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 1 issue:
> >
> https
Hi everyone,
Yesterday I needed to test a maven plugin around graal so wrote a junit5
extension relying on testcontainers. Think it is close to this thread so
sharing the idea/code:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geronimo-arthur.git;a=blob;f=integration-test/src/test/java/org/apache/geronim
18 matches
Mail list logo
