Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Version 3.6.2

2019-09-02 Thread Dan Tran
+1 non-bind, tested with company production builds. Should we give Intellij user a warning? On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 2:05 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > > the vote passed with the following resuts: > +1 jes...@udby.com, Tibor Digana, Mickael Istria, Romain Manni-Bucau, > Francois Papon, Hervé

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Version 3.6.2

2019-09-02 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hi, the vote passed with the following resuts: +1 jes...@udby.com, Tibor Digana, Mickael Istria, Romain Manni-Bucau, Francois Papon, Hervé Boutemy, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Olivier Lamy, Mirko Friedenhagen, Tamas Cserveak, Gabriel Berlingueres, Grzegorz Grzybek, Sylwester Lachiewicz, Robert Scholte, M

Re: Draft of release notes for Maven 3.6.2

2019-09-02 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Thank you Gary. I have updated the draft of release notes: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/99/files I am closing the vote now and move forward with the release. I will use that branch as base for the release notes, we can always amend/fix/enhance them Enrico Il giorno lun 2 set 2019 a

Re: Draft of release notes for Maven 3.6.2

2019-09-02 Thread Gary Gregory
FWIW, over in Apache Commons, I take the following approach when filling in the due-to attribute for an issue in changes.xml: I list the reporter first (the person who created the jira or wrote an email, then each person who participated in any way in chronological order, even if it is just making

Re: Draft of release notes for Maven 3.6.2

2019-09-02 Thread Tibor Digana
We have the contributors in POM. See this https://github.com/apache/maven/blob/master/pom.xml#L120 This dicussion is also personal opinions which is acceptable for thinking of new improvements in the release processes. We can always improve them and simplify. Next time, I vote for production of A

Re: Draft of release notes for Maven 3.6.2

2019-09-02 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Agree, +1 for a single list (see last paragraph for a note on this) @Tibor: we dont really have a contibutor section in the pom :p. Joke apart, it cant be used at all here because it ignores the time slice the report requires and does not scale well in time. Jira and git are reliable and easily sc

Re: Draft of release notes for Maven 3.6.2

2019-09-02 Thread Robert Scholte
On Mon, 02 Sep 2019 19:59:01 +0200, Enrico Olivelli wrote: Any suggestion ? I am leaning towards creating a single list of "Contributors" and a list of "Reporters" I agree with Romain that we're kind of mixing the different kind of reports, but in all cases every block of text needs to

Re: Draft of release notes for Maven 3.6.2

2019-09-02 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Any suggestion ? I am leaning towards creating a single list of "Contributors" and a list of "Reporters" I have to close the VOTE, I will wait to reach consensus on this release notes stuff before closing the vote. Enrico Il giorno sab 31 ago 2019 alle ore 17:18 Tibor Digana < tibordig...@apach

Re: incorrect link on HTML site

2019-09-02 Thread Sylwester Lachiewicz
Hi Ewa, now the link should lead to the correct location. Sylwester czw., 29 sie 2019 o 07:46 Śliwińska, Ewa napisał(a): > Hello, > > link „maven 3 compatibility notes” on > https://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-profiles.html > site is leading to “Page not found”. > I kin

Re: Found Issues - Release Apache Maven Version 3.6.2

2019-09-02 Thread Alexander Bubenchikov
Sorry for late reply, Tibor. I'll look into it and create a new thread/PR regarding this. Despite it will not solve our problems with maintaining compatibility now (there are plenty of users who need old maven versions), it will greatly helps in future. On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:51 PM Tibor Digan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Version 3.6.2

2019-09-02 Thread Arnaud Héritier
+1 (I had only the time to test on few projects - no regression found) On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 2:16 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Le dim. 1 sept. 2019 à 12:50, Michael Osipov a > écrit : > > > Am 2019-08-28 um 21:17 schrieb Enrico Olivelli: > > > Hi, > > > > > > We have so