Maven's snapshot of central repository

2019-02-26 Thread khaledkucse
Hi, I am a newbie and wants to work with maven data. I found a dataset at: https://data.4tu.nl/repository/uuid:68a0e837-4fda-407a-949e-a159546e67b6 But that was the snapshot of the central repository dated July 30, 2011. I would like to use the latest snapshot. I will use the data for my master'

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Resolver version 1.3.2

2019-02-26 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 on *.jar binaries check, I was able to rebuild the jars: they were built with javac compiler from JDK 11 on a unix family OS, and I get the exact same bytecode (even if I built with JDK 11.0 when Karl Heinz built with JDK 11.0.1) There were the usual not Reproducible Build little differences,

Re: Surefire maintenance release

2019-02-26 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi Using slack is a good idea for discussion. But bear mind @ASF all decisions must appear on a mailing list or in a jira ticket. Interesting blog entry regarding this topic "If it didn’t happen on the mailing list, it didn’t happen." http://theapacheway.com/on-list/ think about timezone or people

Re: Surefire maintenance release

2019-02-26 Thread Tibor Digana
Stephane, I have been quite busy with other JUnit5 work - SUREFIRE-1585. Can you join us in the chat on Slack "the-asf.slack.com"? You will find the Channel named "surefire". Ping us as soon as you are ready and we will find some way. I am glad! Cheers Tibor On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:54 AM Stepha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Artifact Transfer Version 0.11.0

2019-02-26 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, +1 from me. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 24.02.19 21:34, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi to all, We solved 3 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12344643 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.o

Re: Surefire maintenance release

2019-02-26 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Thanks Robert. To emphasis on the goal, we'd like to get a GA release of surefire that fully supports JUnit 5 (including the use of the vintage engine) and we'd like to see if it would be possible to backport the two fixes I've mentioned. If there is an appetite for that, we're happy to help and t