Il gio 3 gen 2019, 22:37 Tibor Digana ha scritto:
> Why the build cannot be triggered on GitHub or PR?
> It's only a URL.
>
You are right, github gives special refs which represents the branch of the
forked repo, like pull/123/head.
The problem is that our CI is configured for gitbox and not fo
I am doing #2.
This means I create a GitBox branch or I run it on my own PC. Not a problem
at all because usually the contributor does not complete it and I have to
add some test or clarify the change in documentation. Sometime I have to
rework the PR even if the idea was good, and I have to squash
On Thu 3 Jan 2019 at 21:37, Tibor Digana wrote:
> Why the build cannot be triggered on GitHub or PR?
> It's only a URL.
> If you see the frequency of PRs in Surefire, 1 or 2 PRs/month, this should
> not be a problem since the Windows build takes 1.5 hour and Linux 1 hour.
> Taking JDK 7 and 11, a
Why the build cannot be triggered on GitHub or PR?
It's only a URL.
If you see the frequency of PRs in Surefire, 1 or 2 PRs/month, this should
not be a problem since the Windows build takes 1.5 hour and Linux 1 hour.
Taking JDK 7 and 11, and one Maven version (3.5) is usually enough on Git
branches
On Thu 3 Jan 2019 at 20:52, Tibor Digana wrote:
> I already lost the point of this thread.
> Still the disk space problem on Windows executors in ASF Jenkins?
> If it's this issue, then why the workspace is not investigated directly on
> the system with remote access?
> Jenkins is very good tool
+1 tested with maven-3.6.1-SNAPSHOT plus wagon-3.3.1 against a large build.
-D
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 5:28 AM Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318122&version=12344772
>
> There are still a couple of issues
Il gio 3 gen 2019, 21:52 Tibor Digana ha scritto:
> I already lost the point of this thread.
>
We are trying to figure out how to give better support for new
contributions, the first point is to give feedback as soon as possible (an
automatic build is the top)
Enrico
Still the disk space prob
I already lost the point of this thread.
Still the disk space problem on Windows executors in ASF Jenkins?
If it's this issue, then why the workspace is not investigated directly on
the system with remote access?
Jenkins is very good tool and I do not want to use Travis but Travis is one
step after
On Thu 3 Jan 2019 at 18:03, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Il gio 3 gen 2019, 17:38 Mickael Istria ha scritto:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think this discussion is diverging into "trying TravisCI for some
> > plugins" and is loosing focus on the initial question of how to improve
> the
> > build+test flow to
Il gio 3 gen 2019, 17:38 Mickael Istria ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I think this discussion is diverging into "trying TravisCI for some
> plugins" and is loosing focus on the initial question of how to improve the
> build+test flow to get faster feedback as a contributor or as a reviewer.
> Can the Git
Hi,
I think this discussion is diverging into "trying TravisCI for some
plugins" and is loosing focus on the initial question of how to improve the
build+test flow to get faster feedback as a contributor or as a reviewer.
Can the GitHub PR builder plugin be enabled on Maven Core ? Committers
would
Hi,
We solved 6 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318122&version=12344772
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20WAGON%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved
Staging repo:
https://reposi
I am canceling the vote because the change introduced in WAGON-537
triggered a bug in JSch which we need to work around: WAGON-544.
I will recall the vote with a fixed version.
Michael
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...
Il gio 3 gen 2019, 08:19 Hervé BOUTEMY ha scritto:
> yes, on our 100 Git repos [1], 90% should be easy to run on any CI with
> minimum configuration and resources
>
> then there is Maven core and complex plugins (like Surefire) which are not
> the
> same story
>
> if someone wants to test other t
i've provided a PR [1] for ARCHETYPE-536 some time ago - it's really a small
change, integration test is included.
can it be added to the code base?
thanks!
stefan
[1] https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/20
-
To u
15 matches
Mail list logo
