It was a component [1] but now it is a plugin [2].
[1]: https://github.com/apache/maven-jarsigner
[2]: https://github.com/apache/maven-jarsigner-plugin
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 6:32 PM Eric Lilja wrote:
> If one just reads the list, it's hard to understand why this is voted on
> again after this
Let's say I have the following:
4.0.0
com.example
a
1.0.0
pom
https://example.com/a
scm:git:https://example.com/a
scm:git:https://example.com/a
And then:
4.0.0
com.example
a
1.0.0
com.example
b
1.0.0
pom
https://example.com/b
If one just reads the list, it's hard to understand why this is voted on
again after this announcement [1] (but I can see it didn't make it to
Maven central). Seems some off-list communication have taken place here...
[1]
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/201810.mbox/%3Cop.zr
+1
sob., 3.11.2018, 13:45: Tibor Digana napisał(a):
> +1
>
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 11:32 AM Robert Scholte
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 8 issues:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317528&version=12330856&styleName=Text
> >
> > There are still
+1
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 11:32 AM Robert Scholte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 8 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317528&version=12330856&styleName=Text
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql
Hi,
We solved 8 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317528&version=12330856&styleName=Text
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012317528%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20
I am cancelling the first vote due to failed build and we can continue
with second vote. Sorry for that.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 5:00 PM Tibor Digana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 4 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927&version=12342871
>
> There are
I am cancelling the first vote due to failed build and we can continue with
second vote. Sorry for that.
