Hi,
I would like to know if someone is interested to make a Dev Room
submission for FOSDEM cause the closing dates are at 20.September..
I have some ideas for this:
1. Future development
Going more into details (we have many things in Wiki)
could be part of the schedule.
Discuss / P
Hi,
On 14/09/18 08:06, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
+1 to merging MNG-5951
If this ready than of course we should get it into master...
then call it Maven 3.6.0, since this is not a bugfix but a little enhancement
(long awaited...)
Yeah than it's not a bug fix anymore...
the only issue is that t
+1 to merging MNG-5951
then call it Maven 3.6.0, since this is not a bugfix but a little enhancement
(long awaited...)
the only issue is that the changelog is really tiny: but do we really need
huge changelog before doing a non-bugfix release?
Regards,
Hervé
Le jeudi 13 septembre 2018, 22:32:
Hi Sylwester,
as you wrote the IT's are fine and now you can merge that branch back to
master. Just to be sure check the master if something has came into
master ...and make a rebase against master...(I expect that you don't
get something).
If you get something new to the rebase and make a p
On 2018-09-13T22:20:06 +0200
Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi,
> based on the issues have been solved..
>
> from my point of view waiting at the moment for the following issues:
>
>
> * MNG-6311
> * MNG-6391
>
> Afterwards I would like to cut a release of Maven Core...
>
> This results in
Hi,
based on the issues have been solved..
from my point of view waiting at the moment for the following issues:
* MNG-6311
* MNG-6391
Afterwards I would like to cut a release of Maven Core...
This results into the question:
Should we call it 3.6.0 or 3.5.5..?
Based on the fixed issues wh
