Re: Releasing Plexus Archiver 3.6.1 and plexus IO 3.0.1

Sorry, the correct Plexus Archiver version is 3.6.0 On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 9:50 AM, Plamen Totev wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to prepare a release for Plexus Archiver 3.6.1 [1] and > Plexus IO 3.0.1[2]. There are a couple of bug fixes and support for > modular JAR archive is introduced. If ther

Releasing Plexus Archiver 3.6.1 and plexus IO 3.0.1

Hi, I would like to prepare a release for Plexus Archiver 3.6.1 [1] and Plexus IO 3.0.1[2]. There are a couple of bug fixes and support for modular JAR archive is introduced. If there are no objections on the opened pull requests I'll merge them. Also I'll update the dependencies. But that is far

Re: Speeding up Maven

Can you yourself try another dissimilar machine?

Re: Speeding up Maven

On 2018-04-13T16:29:27 -0400 Paul Hammant wrote: > Mark, > > Assuming a pre-filled Maven local cache, I've a 16 second build that's only > longer when I run a screen recorder in order to make the video show here - > https://paulhammant.com/2017/02/05/a-16-second-java-webapp-build-including-webdr

Re: Speeding up Maven

On 2018-04-13T21:48:58 +0200 Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi Mark, 'Ello. > On 13/04/18 21:20, Mark Raynsford wrote: > > First it would be good to know which Maven version are you using? And on > which JDK you are running? Hah, I purposefully left out details in the hope that it wouldn't be

Re: Speeding up Maven

there's a rather > large and apparently fixed amount of overhead per invocation. Take the > following "could not be simpler" project: > > https://github.com/io7m/maven-minimal-20180413 > > I piped the output through tai64n [1] to give a better indication of > ex

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Clean Plugin version 3.1.0

Hi, On 13/04/18 17:51, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Tibor Digana, Olivier Lamy, Karl Heinz Marbaise Sorry I missed Hervé Boutemy with it's vote... PMC quorum: reached. I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. Kind regards Ka

Re: Speeding up Maven

m actually executing it from an IDE rather than using the IDE's built-in compiler. It seems like there's a rather large and apparently fixed amount of overhead per invocation. Take the following "could not be simpler" project: https://github.com/io7m/maven-minimal-20180413 I pipe

Re: Speeding up Maven

it from an IDE rather than using the IDE's built-in compiler. It seems like there's a rather large and apparently fixed amount of overhead per invocation. Take the following "could not be simpler" project: https://github.com/io7m/maven-minimal-20180413 Maybe I misunderstand

Speeding up Maven

invocation. Take the following "could not be simpler" project: https://github.com/io7m/maven-minimal-20180413 I piped the output through tai64n [1] to give a better indication of exactly how long everything is taking. That's a project that compiles a single Java file and produces a jar. I

Re: [IMPORTANT CHANGE] building and publishing our website from Jenkins and Git instead of CMS

Hi Hervé, On 12/04/18 08:17, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Hi, I'm working with infra for a good time on Git migration for site source, which will de-facto mean that we drop Apache CMS (that only supports svn for source): see INFRA-16088 [1] Today, we got a first visible result: Jenkins was able to bui

Re: [IMPORTANT CHANGE] building and publishing our website from Jenkins and Git instead of CMS

Hi, On 12/04/18 08:17, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Hi, I'm working with infra for a good time on Git migration for site source, which will de-facto mean that we drop Apache CMS (that only supports svn for source): see INFRA-16088 [1] Today, we got a first visible result: Jenkins was able to build and

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Clean Plugin version 3.1.0

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Tibor Digana, Olivier Lamy, Karl Heinz Marbaise PMC quorum: reached. I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise - To unsubscribe

Re: Help with testing on OS/X 10

@Paul I am not a Mac user. I only know from what the user has specified in the Jira issue. Feel free to participate in the Jira ticket. On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Paul Hammant wrote: > OS/X == OS X (former OS name) == macOS (current OS name) ? > > 10 == 10.10.x ? > -- Cheers Tibor

Re: Help with testing on OS/X 10

Hi Olivier, The Dockerfile is in the jira comment too. Only these two lines of code in Dockerfile: FROM maven:3.5.3-jdk-8-alpine COPY ./. / On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 2:13 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi > Happy to help, > But your comment says > > sudo docker build --no-cache -t mymvn:1 -f ./Dock

Re: Help with testing on OS/X 10

To make sure I understand, you need somebody to run that test in a Docker container running on OS/X host, did I get it right? The reason I ask, Docker runs containers in a linux virtual machine on OS/X hosts, which is quite different environment compared to what I _think_ the bug reporter is doi

Re: Help with testing on OS/X 10

Hi Happy to help, But your comment says sudo docker build --no-cache -t mymvn:1 -f ./Dockerfile . where is this Dockerfile? On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 at 22:04, Paul Hammant wrote: > OS/X == OS X (former OS name) == macOS (current OS name) ? > > 10 == 10.10.x ? > -- Olivier Lamy http://twitter.com

Re: Help with testing on OS/X 10

OS/X == OS X (former OS name) == macOS (current OS name) ? 10 == 10.10.x ?

Help with testing on OS/X 10

Hi All, I want to ask you to help us with testing one issue which can be reproduced only on OS/X 10. I tried to run a small test on Ubuntu 17 x86_64 but I could not reproduce an issue of surefire plugin. Here is a comment in Jira issue. I described there steps I run Docker (CE 18.03) container wi