Re: Build vs Consumer POM study

Hervé, Great work! Some possible additions for the wiki page: Naming Conventions consumer pom must continue to be named pom.xml build pom shall be called build.xml alternate build inputs could be build.json or build.yaml EcoSystem Impacts projects distributing source code through maven central

Re: Build vs Consumer POM study

Le dimanche 11 mars 2018, 22:48:18 CET Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit : > Hi, > > On 11/03/18 22:37, Sander Verhagen wrote: > > This is a great proposal, even in its current form. But as a long term > > Maven user, > I have a few modest questions and remarks, though. (Sorry if you didn't > mean for n

Re: Build vs Consumer POM study

Le dimanche 11 mars 2018, 21:14:16 CET Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit : > Hi Hervé, > > On 11/03/18 21:05, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > Le dimanche 11 mars 2018, 20:36:15 CET Tibor Digana a écrit : > >> Why the column with build POM in table does not have all items green +? > > > > ok, I should probably

Re: Maven site menu rework

this feature is expected to be already available: see target attribute in menu item [1] Please check and confirm it works with the skin you're using (since I suppose some skins may not implement the feature) Regards, Hervé [1] http://maven.apache.org/doxia/doxia-sitetools/doxia-decoration-mo

Re: Build vs Consumer POM study

Hi, On 11/03/18 22:37, Sander Verhagen wrote: This is a great proposal, even in its current form. But as a long term Maven user, > I have a few modest questions and remarks, though. (Sorry if you didn't mean for non-developer to chime in...) It's really good to hear from a Maven user. This i

Re: Build vs Consumer POM study

This is a great proposal, even in its current form. But as a long term Maven user, I have a few modest questions and remarks, though. (Sorry if you didn't mean for non-developer to chime in...) It would probably good to mandate some sort of still, and to have a hint of a strategy in place for

Re: Build vs Consumer POM study

Hi Hervé, On 11/03/18 21:05, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Le dimanche 11 mars 2018, 20:36:15 CET Tibor Digana a écrit : Why the column with build POM in table does not have all items green +? ok, I should probably simply not have put this column: it is confusing. Just ignore this column Why there ar

Re: Maven site menu rework

I'm happy you like it: every feature was there, it was just waiting to be used There are probably missing documents in the tree, don't hesitate to classify missing ones Regards, Hervé Le dimanche 11 mars 2018, 19:28:07 CET Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit : > Hi Hervé, > > On 11/03/18 18:12, Hervé

Re: Build vs Consumer POM study

Le dimanche 11 mars 2018, 20:40:39 CET Tibor Digana a écrit : > Is the consumer POM useful only for packaging=jar? no, it's useful for any packaging not =pom > Because which other packagings use to have transitive dependencies as well? remember: consumer POM is just an explicit reduction of curren

Re: Build vs Consumer POM study

Le dimanche 11 mars 2018, 20:36:15 CET Tibor Digana a écrit : > Why the column with build POM in table does not have all items green +? ok, I should probably simply not have put this column: it is confusing. Just ignore this column > Why there are two consumer POM's? Some is old proposal and secon

Re: Maven site menu rework

for the site menü I'd like to suggest an option for links to open pages in a new window. html: target blank. this is quit usful for javsdoc cobertura etc. regards .marco Get Outlook for Android From: Hervé BOUTEMY Sent: Sunday, March 11,

Re: Build vs Consumer POM study

Is the consumer POM useful only for packaging=jar? Because which other packagings use to have transitive dependencies as well? On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Tibor Digana wrote: > Why the column with build POM in table does not have all items green +? > Why there are two consumer POM's? Some i

Re: Build vs Consumer POM study

Why the column with build POM in table does not have all items green +? Why there are two consumer POM's? Some is old proposal and second is yours? Some consumer POMs may become BOM and there I would miss dependencyManagement. On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 6:03 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > Hi, > > I wro

Re: Maven site menu rework

Hi Hervé, On 11/03/18 18:12, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Hi, As you may have noticed, I reworked the Maven site's menu quite a lot to improve users navigation (without changing any content: just menu). For example: http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-using-modello.html I also simplified first

Maven site menu rework

Hi, As you may have noticed, I reworked the Maven site's menu quite a lot to improve users navigation (without changing any content: just menu). For example: http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-using-modello.html I also simplified first menu under a "Use" umbrella http://maven.apache.org/

Build vs Consumer POM study

Hi, I wrote a Proposal in the Wiki about Build vs Consumer POM [1] and coded a simplified model for the Consumer POM [2] As written in the proposal, this would permit us to create new POM versions that change everything but not the Consumer POM part without breaking any compatibility with exist

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Help Plugin version 3.0.0

I will withhold the announcement for now because an overenthusiastic user spotted 3.0.0 already on GitHub and reported an NPE. Until this is sorted out. Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For ad

Development in Surefire 3.0.0-M1

Hi All, The purpose of Version 3.0.0-M1 is a preliminary result of those issues which are part of 3.0.0. This includes Maven API 3.0.0 + Java 7 + bug fixing. Maybe 10 issues in release 3.0.0-M1. Regarding applied Maven API I have already started making an overview of commits in the branch 3.0-rc1