Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.3

2018-03-03 Thread herve . boutemy
+1 both for immediate vote and for the plan to release as is then releasing ASAP 3.5.4 Regards, Hervé - Mail original - De: "Mirko Friedenhagen" À: "Maven Developers List" Envoyé: Samedi 3 Mars 2018 13:42:43 Objet: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.3 I would suggest releasing as is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.3

2018-03-03 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
I would suggest releasing as is as well. State in the announcement that there might be a problem with parallel builds on Windows, workaround with batch mode is easy anyway. And if 3.5.4 only contains the fixed jansi dependency, releasing should be fast and simple. Best regards Mirko -- Sent fro

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20.1

2018-03-03 Thread Tibor Digana
Maybe disappointed a bit on how we run the build with Java 1.8 and another J7 - J10 used in all Tests (unit + integration tests). $ mvn install -P run-its -nsu -Dintegration-test-port=8000 -Dintegration-test-stop-port=8001 "-Djdk.home=d:\Program Files\Java\jdk10" -Djacoco.skip=true There were sever

Re: surefire-junit47 depends on dummy:dummy:jar:1.0?

2018-03-03 Thread Tibor Digana
Regarding the "dummy" artifact, we do not have to do anything in here and not to report a bug because the next release together with new API 3.0 naturally removes this hack. Thx On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Alex O'Ree wrote: > I was about to post the stack trace when i more carefully read the

Re: Surefire release?

2018-03-03 Thread Tibor Digana
Hello Olivier, We can continue with the next work in parallel if you agree. Basically two things to do. The Java 7 and API 3.0. The branch 3.0-rc-1 already exists. So would rather take this because I know the branch and it contains a lots of 3.0 commits which need to be squashed in one and master

Re: Surefire release?

2018-03-03 Thread Tibor Digana
Let's see if I have to send a new email. The release notes, deployment and SHA1 are related to right version. Only the title is bad. On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Thank you ! > I will test on my company projects as soon as possible (maybe monday). > > nit: is The sub

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.3

2018-03-03 Thread Tibor Digana
+1 from me. I did not find any issue. On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 11:00 PM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 22 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > version=12341428&styleName=Text&projectId=12316922 > > There are 381 issues

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20.1

2018-03-03 Thread Tibor Digana
Typo, the version is 2.21.0 of course. On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Tibor Digana wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 33 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12317927&version=12341630 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > https://issues.apache.

Re: Surefire release?

2018-03-03 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Thank you ! I will test on my company projects as soon as possible (maybe monday). nit: is The subject of the vote thread wrong ? Enrico 2018-03-03 12:44 GMT+01:00 Tibor Digana : > The e-mail went out. The vote has started. > Should I mention how to run the build with other JDK and follow the

Re: Surefire release?

2018-03-03 Thread Tibor Digana
The e-mail went out. The vote has started. Should I mention how to run the build with other JDK and follow the README.md on GitHub? On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 8:16 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il ven 2 mar 2018, 19:43 Tibor Digana ha scritto: > > > I will close the Jira Version and I will complete

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20.1

2018-03-03 Thread Tibor Digana
Hi, We solved 33 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927&version=12341630 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#issues/?jql=project+%3D+SUREFIRE+AND+status+%3D+Open+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC Staging repo: https://

Re: Download link

2018-03-03 Thread Stephen Connolly
On Sat 3 Mar 2018 at 09:02, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > I just realized that our download link from the download page[1] points to: > > http://artfiles.org/apache.org/maven/ > > Is that intentional ? Depends on geolocation... my link is http://mirrors.whoishostingthis.com/apache/maven

Download link

2018-03-03 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, I just realized that our download link from the download page[1] points to: http://artfiles.org/apache.org/maven/ Is that intentional ? Good idea? on http instead of https ? Why not using: https://www.apache.org/dist/maven/ Maybe I missed somthing ? Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise