+1 for them Hervé
Thx
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:29 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a new list of fixes I'd like to merge:
>
> - update parent pom to version 31
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-
> wip/job/maven/job/upgrade_parent_pom/
>
> - MNG-6255 Maven scri
Le samedi 10 février 2018, 19:31:13 CET Sylwester Lachiewicz a écrit :
> Hi,
> i would like to add also:
> https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/149 to fast fix all checkstyle
> violations
+1
> MNG-6069 https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/153 commons-cli updates
> MNG-5378 https://github.com/apach
Hi,
i would like to add also:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/149 to fast fix all checkstyle
violations
MNG-6069 https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/153 commons-cli updates
MNG-5378 https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/155 partial plexus-utils ->
commons-lang
https://github.com/apache/maven/p
GitHub user slachiewicz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/156
Remove Google Guava usage (move to Java7)
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/slachiewicz/maven remove-guava-java7
Alternatively
GitHub user slachiewicz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/155
[MNG-5378] Replace plexus-util StringUtils with commons-lang3
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/slachiewicz/maven fix/MNG-5378
When we had the “big reset” I asked for seconding before merging as the
priority was to get a functioning release out.
IMHO outside of burndown towards a release, a successful CI build of the
branch, providing the branch is fast-forward mergable (not that we actually
do a fast forward merge - merg
+1
I checked also with casting to LoggerLevelRenderer
Sylwester
sob., 10 lut 2018 o 16:31 użytkownik Karl Heinz Marbaise
napisał:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/02/18 16:16, Robert Scholte wrote:
> > Who wants to second
>
> I want ...
>
> +1 from me...
>
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
> >
> > https:/
Hi,
On 10/02/18 16:16, Robert Scholte wrote:
Who wants to second
I want ...
+1 from me...
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
https://github.com/apache/maven/compare/MNG-6353 ?
https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wip/job/maven/job/MNG-6353/
thanks,
Robert
-
Who wants to second
https://github.com/apache/maven/compare/MNG-6353 ?
https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wip/job/maven/job/MNG-6353/
thanks,
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional com
Github user slachiewicz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/153#discussion_r167400525
--- Diff: maven-embedder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/cli/MavenCli.java
---
@@ -1620,14 +1620,18 @@ static void populateProperties( CommandLine
command
Github user slachiewicz closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/154
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Github user slachiewicz closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/150
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Shared Utils, version 3.2.1
This project aims to be a functional replacement for plexus-utils in Maven.
https://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-shared-utils/
You should specify the version in your project's dependency
Jesus, the things are different. Let it be I will complete it this
weekend!!!
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> this build is failing:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/
> surefire/job/SUREFIRE-1463/136/console
> to be able to run with jdk9/10 we need to c
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Robert Scholte, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Hervé BOUTEMY
PMC quorum: reached
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
On Tue, 06 Feb 2018 23:11:40 +0100, Robert Scholte
wrote:
Hi,
We solved 2 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/j
+1
notice I checked build reproducibility with diffoscope: in addition to usual
small differences, there is one unusual difference that surprises me
I built with the exact same JDK version 1.7.0_80, but there are some little
differences in resulting bytecode. Perhaps this is because Robert built
Le samedi 10 février 2018, 00:10:14 CET Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> Policy: snaphots from master branches (and possibly long lived maintenance
> branches) are deployed automatically.
+1
for long lived branches, the version must have some differentiator from master
>
> Build setup: downstream project
this build is failing:
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/surefire/job/SUREFIRE-1463/136/console
to be able to run with jdk9/10 we need to change enforcer jdk rule which is
currently [1.8, 1.9)
until this change we cannot build with 9/10 without skipping enforcer check
So if we want
If you could see my issues reported to INFRA you would see what is going
on. I am currently running 23 parallel jobs, also supporting JDK10.
If they run standalone there is no issue. Once the machine is overloaded 3
or 4 problems happen nevertheless JDK is set.
So from my side it is working on JDKs
19 matches
Mail list logo
