[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 3.2.1

Hi, We solved 2 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12340978&styleName=Text There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012317922%20AND%20component%20%3D%20maven-shared-utils%20AN

[GitHub] slachiewicz commented on issue #7: [DOXIA-409] Upgrade to FOP 2.2

slachiewicz commented on issue #7: [DOXIA-409] Upgrade to FOP 2.2 URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-doxia/pull/7#issuecomment-363521508 Yes, i run tests inside doxia (some minor warnings) and today also tests with maven-pdf-plugin and all looks good.

Re: cdi-api leaking?

commented inline Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Re: cdi-api leaking?

On Tuesday, 6 February 2018 at 13:25, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > 2018-02-06 12:25 GMT+01:00 Stuart McCulloch (mailto:mccu...@gmail.com)>: > > > The "javax.enterprise.inject" CDI package was explicitly exported as part > > of the ongoing effort to migrate legacy Plexus components onto more moder

[GitHub] maven-site pull request #9: Addition of Cloudsmith Package to repo-managemen...

Github user alancarson closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/9 --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: cdi-api leaking?

2018-02-06 12:25 GMT+01:00 Stuart McCulloch : > The "javax.enterprise.inject" CDI package was explicitly exported as part > of the ongoing effort to migrate legacy Plexus components onto more modern > standard annotations. > Hmm, this looks wrong from my window cause Maven doesn't support CDI API

Re: cdi-api leaking?

The "javax.enterprise.inject" CDI package was explicitly exported as part of the ongoing effort to migrate legacy Plexus components onto more modern standard annotations. Specifically, the @javax.enterprise.inject.Typed annotation lets components state they are only visible for injection under

Re: cdi-api leaking?

2018-02-06 9:41 GMT+01:00 Tibor Digana : > Personally I would like to see a new Git branch with CDI 2.0 and the > integration test results on Jenkins. > This would give us more confidence. > Question: Does the CDI 2.0 have any NEW mandatory descriptive methods > without default value already intro

Re: cdi-api leaking?

Personally I would like to see a new Git branch with CDI 2.0 and the integration test results on Jenkins. This would give us more confidence. Question: Does the CDI 2.0 have any NEW mandatory descriptive methods without default value already introduced in OLD annotations CDI 1.0/1.1? On Tue, Feb 6