ok, I suppose this is a reminiscence of Maven 2: yes, in Maven 2, there was
this limitation that caused multiple issues linked in MNG-3010
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-3010
As Robert Scholte noticed, perhaps there are still a few glitches with some
plugins here and there, that requi
Looks like I'm just plain wrong (and happy about it). I'm not sure where
that memory came from. Perhaps maven 2 some time ago, though it felt fresh
in my mind. Apologies for the noise! :-(
On 11 January 2018 at 11:22, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> Le mercredi 10 janvier 2018, 10:21:35 CET Andreas Sewe
yes, the tag for apache-5 is bizarre
I chose not to do much investigation and let it as is
I'll just drop history documentation for these very old versions: honestly,
nobody cares
Thanks for your in depth tests and report
Regards,
Hervé
Le mercredi 10 janvier 2018, 17:21:00 CET Plamen Totev a
Le mercredi 10 janvier 2018, 10:21:35 CET Andreas Sewe a écrit :
> Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> > notice that Central contains artifacts produced by Maven but also by other
> > tools: I did some analysis myself and found strange things also that are
> > clearly not produced by Maven. Scala for example pr
Why do you say that Maven can't handle 4 part versions?
I fixed MNG-3010 near 10 years ago for Maven 3.0.0-alpha-1
this was a versioning limitation removal with enhancement documented in
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVENOLD/Versioning
I can tell you that since this fix, it supp
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:07:08 +0100, Andreas Sewe
wrote:
Fred Cooke wrote:
Re versions, I know the background on it, but it annoys me that maven
can't
handle 4 part versions, 1.2.3.4 as sometimes it's handy to do a patch
level
that deep. Lots of messed up software in the world :-)
The n
Hi,
I actually just noticed that the `apache-5` tag is not fixed. Is that on
purpose? As result GitHub cannot compare the difference between
6 and 5[1] (the last link in the table). It says they don't have
anything in common(if the tag is not fixed that is to be expected).
Also I have noticed th
Fred Cooke wrote:
> Re versions, I know the background on it, but it annoys me that maven can't
> handle 4 part versions, 1.2.3.4 as sometimes it's handy to do a patch level
> that deep. Lots of messed up software in the world :-)
Are you sure that's still the case (the parts-restriction, not the
(resending)
Hi Tibor,
Do you have any plan about the release date of surefire 2.21.0 ?
If you have some tasks to do I will be happy to help.
Cheers
Enrico
Re versions, I know the background on it, but it annoys me that maven can't
handle 4 part versions, 1.2.3.4 as sometimes it's handy to do a patch level
that deep. Lots of messed up software in the world :-)
Format should be N[.N as many times as needed][optional hyphen and
qualifier of some sort]
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> notice that Central contains artifacts produced by Maven but also by other
> tools: I did some analysis myself and found strange things also that are
> clearly not produced by Maven. Scala for example produces some artifacts that
> I doubt could be referenced by Maven.
Ye
11 matches
Mail list logo
