Le dimanche 10 décembre 2017, 19:26:53 CET Robert Scholte a écrit :
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 18:38:55 +0100, Stephen Connolly
>
> wrote:
> > On Sun 10 Dec 2017 at 17:12, Robert Scholte wrote:
> >> On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 17:46:10 +0100, Hervé BOUTEMY
> >>
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Le dimanche 10 décemb
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 18:38:55 +0100, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
On Sun 10 Dec 2017 at 17:12, Robert Scholte wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 17:46:10 +0100, Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
> Le dimanche 10 décembre 2017, 11:06:32 CET Robert Scholte a écrit :
>> I still think it is ugly to use the HR for th
On Sun 10 Dec 2017 at 17:12, Robert Scholte wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 17:46:10 +0100, Hervé BOUTEMY
> wrote:
>
> > Le dimanche 10 décembre 2017, 11:06:32 CET Robert Scholte a écrit :
> >> I still think it is ugly to use the HR for this kind of info.
> >> If you *really* want this info, I'd pr
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 17:46:10 +0100, Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
Le dimanche 10 décembre 2017, 11:06:32 CET Robert Scholte a écrit :
I still think it is ugly to use the HR for this kind of info.
If you *really* want this info, I'd prefer a new line, offering more
space
for additional info.
yes, I
Le dimanche 10 décembre 2017, 11:06:32 CET Robert Scholte a écrit :
> I still think it is ugly to use the HR for this kind of info.
> If you *really* want this info, I'd prefer a new line, offering more space
> for additional info.
yes, I *really* want this info: the precise details on how to displ
On Sun 10 Dec 2017 at 10:06, Robert Scholte wrote:
> I still think it is ugly to use the HR for this kind of info.
I think the HR use with space *not [] is a beautiful solution
> If you *really* want this info, I'd prefer a new line, offering more space
> for additional info.
Ugh no... buil
I still think it is ugly to use the HR for this kind of info.
If you *really* want this info, I'd prefer a new line, offering more space
for additional info.
Other option is to leave it as it is. If developers want it, they can put
it in the name.
So -1 for me.
Robert
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017
is there a seconder for this enhancement?
CI: https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.x-jenkinsfile/
job/MNG-6308_display_packaging/
Jira issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6308
Regards,
Hervé
-
here is a list of strange issues in CI jobs:
- Doxia Sitetools is failing at checkout [1]
- Maven core branches fail in maven-wip [2] while the multi-branch does not
fail [3]: AFAIK, same Jenkins files are used, isn't it?
Regards,
Hervé
[1]
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/m
