Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Maven TLP » maven-release » master #3

2017-12-03 Thread Olivier Lamy
On 4 December 2017 at 11:08, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 3 December 2017 at 23:25, Olivier Lamy wrote: > > > is there any way to trigger a build when snapshot dependencies are build? > > (is it using the withMaven?) > > > > it's using withMaven > > > > in this

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Maven TLP » maven-release » master #3

2017-12-03 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 3 December 2017 at 23:25, Olivier Lamy wrote: > is there any way to trigger a build when snapshot dependencies are build? > (is it using the withMaven?) > it's using withMaven > in this case it's only a matter of having maven-scm build and deployed. > Hmmm I don't like ci auto-deploying...

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Maven TLP » maven-release » master #3

2017-12-03 Thread Olivier Lamy
is there any way to trigger a build when snapshot dependencies are build? (is it using the withMaven?) in this case it's only a matter of having maven-scm build and deployed. On 2 December 2017 at 22:25, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here’s the failure. If tracing t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Javadoc Plugin version 3.0.0 (take 3)

2017-12-03 Thread Mark Raynsford
On 2017-12-03T22:50:42 +0100 "Robert Scholte" wrote: > > We solved 27 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317529&version=12330875&styleName=Text > +1 (non-binding) Pretty heavily tested on multiple projects. Both the javadoc and aggregation goals have be

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Javadoc Plugin version 3.0.0 (take 3)

2017-12-03 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, We solved 27 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317529&version=12330875&styleName=Text There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012317529%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20key%2

Re: Surefire at Java 9 and Java 10

2017-12-03 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il dom 3 dic 2017, 17:34 Tibor Digana ha scritto: > 6 months is quite far away. > No reason to be afraid because I can check it nowadays and we will see how > much of the ITs is broken. > The problem in Java 9 was that Oracle broke backwards compatibility and > they did not give us a chance to re

Re: Surefire at Java 9 and Java 10

2017-12-03 Thread Tibor Digana
6 months is quite far away. No reason to be afraid because I can check it nowadays and we will see how much of the ITs is broken. The problem in Java 9 was that Oracle broke backwards compatibility and they did not give us a chance to re-introduce extensions (removed modules) back to JDK. I expecte

Re: Surefire at Java 9 and Java 10

2017-12-03 Thread Tibor Digana
Look, I do not want to force our contributors to rely on java 9 or java 10. They can use their default jdk. My strategy is to fallback to default jdk unless jdk.home system property is specified. I am fine with Jenkins multi-branch if it fails on java 9 before integrating a branch to master. It hap

Re: Surefire at Java 9 and Java 10

2017-12-03 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Tibor, There are IT tests which check for exaclty java.specification.version=9 How are we going to deal with them? It seems that a new major release will appear every 6 months IMHO it will be enough to drop that assertion Enrico Il dom 3 dic 2017, 13:21 Tibor Digana ha scritto: > As discussed

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Indexer version 6.0.0

2017-12-03 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Olivier, Herve, Robert, Manfred, Eric and Andreas PMC quorum: Olivier, Herve, Robert I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. Thanks, T -- Thanks, ~t~

[ANN] Apache Maven Indexer 6.0.0 Released

2017-12-03 Thread Tamás Cservenák
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven Indexer, version 6.0.0 Apache Maven Indexer (former Sonatype Nexus Indexer) is the defacto standard for producing indexes of Maven repositories. The Indexes are produced and consumed by all major tools in the ecosystem.

Surefire at Java 9 and Java 10

2017-12-03 Thread Tibor Digana
As discussed before about Java 9. I will try to run Surefire integration tests with JDK 9 and 10 on Linux and I will add JDK 8/9 to CI pipeline. I do not expect any bugs here. Maybe only enabling some modules for the ITs in worst case. Surefire supports Jigsaw already now in origin/master. There

[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request #166: Support filtering of tests from Base Class...

2017-12-03 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/166#discussion_r154519321 --- Diff: surefire-providers/surefire-testng-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/surefire/testng/utils/MethodSelector.java --- @@ -62,6 +62,17 @@ p

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #166: Support filtering of tests from Base Class (TestN...

2017-12-03 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/166 @krmahadevan Sorry for late reply. I was ill last time and busy in the work. The code conventions are listed in https://maven.apache.org/developers/conventions/code.html In the mi

[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request #166: Support filtering of tests from Base Class...

2017-12-03 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/166#discussion_r154519159 --- Diff: surefire-providers/surefire-testng-utils/src/test/testng/utils/MethodSelectorTest.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,299 @@ +package testng.utils;