Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

2017-10-11 Thread Stephen Connolly
Ok as release manager I am cancelling this vote. I’ll see about spinning 3.5.2 On Thu 12 Oct 2017 at 02:51, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > Le mercredi 11 octobre 2017, 23:47:54 CEST Robert Scholte a écrit : > > I think the conclusion is: 3.5.1 is not correct > > > > it should either be: > > 3.5.2 withou

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

2017-10-11 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le mercredi 11 octobre 2017, 23:47:54 CEST Robert Scholte a écrit : > I think the conclusion is: 3.5.1 is not correct > > it should either be: > 3.5.2 without the 2 classloader related issues. ideally with an option to activate the classloader changes (for people knowing what they are doing or wa

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #167: Speedup Standard Output if Tests

2017-10-11 Thread DaGeRe
Github user DaGeRe commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/167 I adjusted the current commit and PR to code style, could you re-review this one? --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

2017-10-11 Thread Robert Scholte
I think the conclusion is: 3.5.1 is not correct it should either be: 3.5.2 without the 2 classloader related issues. or 3.6.0 including the classloader related issues, but probably improved with a system property to switch back to the 3.5.0-behavior. We also need to improve ITs and documentat

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #167: Speedup Standard Output if Tests

2017-10-11 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/167 Pls do it in a new PR. Here is link for Eclipse/Idea code style xml https://maven.apache.org/developers/conventions/code.html On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Tibor Digana wro

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #167: Speedup Standard Output if Tests

2017-10-11 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/167 You completely changed code style. Please use ASF Maven code style because here I do not see relevant changes. On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 5:52 PM, DaGeRe wrote: > Currently,

Re: Allow custom updatePolicy

2017-10-11 Thread Jonathan Haber
If we did that, then wouldn't the build get really slow every time you hit that 5 minute expiration? On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:49 AM Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote: > > > I just wanted to get thoughts on a possible new feature. Right now, my > > company has thousands of Maven modules

Re: Jenkins and Maven 3.0.5 or JDK 7

2017-10-11 Thread Arnaud Héritier
I agree with Mark about the rule to split: 1 repo = 1 lifecycle But like we said with the number of repo and the flat organisation in infra side it won't be easy :( About sub-modules or sub-trees I never used them myself but I always had various bad feedbacks. About dependencies cycles ... yeah i

[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request #167: Speedup Standard Output if Tests

2017-10-11 Thread DaGeRe
GitHub user DaGeRe opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/167 Speedup Standard Output if Tests Currently, surefire creates a new byte array with size of the input *3 for saving the unescaped input. This made surefire way slower than running a test dire

Re: Allow custom updatePolicy

2017-10-11 Thread Michael Osipov
> I just wanted to get thoughts on a possible new feature. Right now, my > company has thousands of Maven modules that are all on snapshots with an > updatePolicy of "always" (basically everyone gets the latest build of > everything, kind of like a poor man's monorepo). Why "always" then and not

Allow custom updatePolicy

2017-10-11 Thread Jonathan Haber
I just wanted to get thoughts on a possible new feature. Right now, my company has thousands of Maven modules that are all on snapshots with an updatePolicy of "always" (basically everyone gets the latest build of everything, kind of like a poor man's monorepo). This mostly works fine, but one of t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

2017-10-11 Thread Stephen Connolly
I’d really like if somebody could draft the release notes for the two different classloader changes. It will make it easier to decide whether to roll with this or bump minor with (if I recall correctly) the corresponding drop of Java 7 per our policy on JVMs with minor version bump On Wed 11 Oct 2