Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

2017-09-13 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 works well in everything I tested, colour on Windows with GitBash or Cygwin or any other Unix layer taken apart (in fact anything on WIndows that provides "TERM=xterm") workaround for those Windows users: add -Djansi.force=true to MAVEN_OPTS the only drawback will only be if you redirect stdo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20.1

2017-09-13 Thread Tibor Digana
(again from my Apache mail account) Pls participate in the vote and test. On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Tibor Digana wrote: > Pls participate in the vote and test. > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Tibor Digana > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We solved 24 issues: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20.1

2017-09-13 Thread Tibor Digana
Pls participate in the vote and test. On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Tibor Digana wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 24 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12317927&version=12340297 > > There are 101 issues left in JIRA: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#issu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

2017-09-13 Thread Stephen Connolly
On Wed 13 Sep 2017 at 23:30, Mark Derricutt wrote: > On 14 Sep 2017, at 10:26, Mark Derricutt wrote: > > Calling -2 for vote if not too late. > > Actually - looking at the commit diff, I see in our code we did have > true for the jasmine-maven-plugin which we don't > actually need. Removing that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

2017-09-13 Thread Mark Derricutt
On 14 Sep 2017, at 10:26, Mark Derricutt wrote: > Calling -2 for vote if not too late. Actually - looking at the commit diff, I see in our code we did have `true` for the `jasmine-maven-plugin` which we don't actually need. Removing that from the mojo definition and running my build with the s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

2017-09-13 Thread Mark Derricutt
Calling -2 for vote if not too late. Have git bisected from 3.5.0 to HEAD and found the commit that introduced the behaviour: ec629f7d511eb910b4e80112a9fbe85ed8786f10 is the first bad commit commit ec629f7d511eb910b4e80112a9fbe85ed8786f10 Author: Igor Fedorenko Date: Tue Apr 11 07:59:34 2017

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven JLink Plugin version 3.0.0-alpha-1 (First Public Release)

2017-09-13 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Robert Scholte, Hervé Boutemy, Karl Heinz Marbaise PMC quorum: reached. I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise - To unsubscr

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Dependency Plugin version 3.0.2

2017-09-13 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Stephane Nicoll, Oliver Lamy, Harvé Boutemy, Anders Hammar, Tibor Digana, Karl Heinz Marbaise PMC quorum: reached. I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Dependency Plugin version 3.0.2

2017-09-13 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, here is my +1. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 09/09/17 14:34, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, We solved 7 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317227&version=12341254 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/ji

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven JMod Plugin version 3.0.0-alpha-1 (First Public Release)

2017-09-13 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
I will cancel the VOTE based on found issues.. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 09/09/17 15:52, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, this is the VOTE for the first public release for Maven JMod Plugin... We solved 1 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1232143

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven JMod Plugin version 3.0.0-alpha-1 (First Public Release)

2017-09-13 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Robert, On 11/09/17 21:11, Robert Scholte wrote: Hi, isn't it weird that jmod:create has parameters for classpath and modulepath? why not start using the dependencies as specified in the pom? and the plugin shouldn't use artifactId as default for the modulename. Current best practice is t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20.1

2017-09-13 Thread jieryn
+1 non-binding, tried with OpenJDK Java 8, Linux x86_64, tried on a bunch of internal projects, non-forking mode but with --threads 2, all junit tests, about 3k in total, tried failsafe plugin for arquillian tests, all looks right did not test exotic testing modes nor site plugin report Thanks Ti

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

2017-09-13 Thread jieryn
+1 non-binding I tested with OpenJDK Java 8 on Linux x86_64 with a variety of projects. Everything looks good, the only new behavior I'm seeing is a warning: [WARNING] The project <> uses prerequisites which is only intended for maven-plugin projects but not for non maven-plugin projects. For suc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

2017-09-13 Thread Robert Scholte
Just received the confirmation that netbeans uses the cli, so there should be no issue there.  Robert  Verzonden vanaf mijn Samsung Galaxy-smartphone. Oorspronkelijk bericht Van: Stephen Connolly Datum: 13-09-17 10:05 (GMT+01:00) Aan: Maven Developers List Onderwerp: Re: [VO

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

2017-09-13 Thread Robert Scholte
Just received the confirmation that netbeans uses the cli, so there should be no issue there.  Robert  Verzonden vanaf mijn Samsung Galaxy-smartphone. Oorspronkelijk bericht Van: Stephen Connolly Datum: 13-09-17 10:05 (GMT+01:00) Aan: Maven Developers List Onderwerp: Re: [VO

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

2017-09-13 Thread Arnaud Héritier
Damned, can't we be anonymous on Github ? I maintain it is a big word, I'm trying to fix more bugs than I add new ones I added Oleg in the loop as he contributed a lot on it too I did a quick test to build on Jenkins 2.60.3 our maven core with the Evil Maven plugin 2.17 on a local SSH agent and it

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20.1

2017-09-13 Thread Dan Tran
+1 non binding, works with my production build and I can only test with snapshot On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Thomas Collignon wrote: > Hello > > +1 for me > > 2017-09-12 10:29 GMT+02:00 Tibor Digana : > > > Hi Dan, > > Yes you can use such version. The URL for snapshots is > > https://rep

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

2017-09-13 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 13 September 2017 at 01:05, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13 September 2017 at 00:26, Anders Hammar wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Stephen Connolly < >> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Have we got any feedback from the embedder in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

2017-09-13 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 13 September 2017 at 00:26, Anders Hammar wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Have we got any feedback from the embedder integrations yet? > > > > I haven't heard anything from the m2e people. Maybe we need to ping them >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

2017-09-13 Thread Anders Hammar
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Have we got any feedback from the embedder integrations yet? > I haven't heard anything from the m2e people. Maybe we need to ping them directly. I can contact Fred Bricon. /Anders > > On Mon 11 Sep 2