RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion JDBC T4 driver 2.2.0

2017-08-20 Thread Liu, Ming (Ming)
Thank you Olivier ! So I think I should vote in Apache Trafodion mail list :-) thanks, Ming -Original Message- From: Olivier Lamy [mailto:ol...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 2:46 PM To: Liu, Ming (Ming) Cc: Maven Developers List ; Xu, Kai-Hua (Kevin) ; Peng, Huai-Tao (Alex

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion JDBC T4 driver 2.2.0

2017-08-20 Thread Olivier Lamy
This is the page to release Maven component. (ie. artifacts generated by the Maven project itself) The Maven project cannot vote for your release! Please refer to http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html On 21 August 2017 at 16:40, Liu, Ming (Ming) wrote: > sorry, we want to p

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion JDBC T4 driver 2.2.0

2017-08-20 Thread Liu, Ming (Ming)
sorry, we want to publish our JDBC driver into Maven central repository and I refer to this page : http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-project-release-procedure.html to call for a vote. If this is the wrong list, could someone help to point me the correct list? Or any other referen

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #162: SUREFIRE-1384: ProviderInfo for JUnit Plattform (...

2017-08-20 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/162 Sorry my bad, yes master has enforcer with JDK8 (due to javadoc checks within compile time) however maven.compoler.source/target is 1.6. I will have a look in to junit5 branch. --- If yo

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #162: SUREFIRE-1384: ProviderInfo for JUnit Plattform (...

2017-08-20 Thread britter
Github user britter commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/162 @Tibor17 for the JUnit Plattform Provider we even need JDK 8! Can you merge Master to junit5 Branch so we have the enforcer fixes? Than I can rebase this PR. Thank you! --- If your

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion JDBC T4 driver 2.2.0

2017-08-20 Thread Olivier Lamy
I guess it's the wrong list :-) On 21 August 2017 at 15:43, Liu, Ming (Ming) wrote: > Hi, > We solved N issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRAFODION-2554 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRAFODION-2544 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRAFODION-2513 > > Staging repo: >

[VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion JDBC T4 driver 2.2.0

2017-08-20 Thread Liu, Ming (Ming)
Hi, We solved N issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRAFODION-2554 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRAFODION-2544 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRAFODION-2513 Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/#stagingRepositories/orgapachetrafodion-1006 https://repository.apache.

[GitHub] maven-plugins pull request #127: isolate and fix issue with PMD Report, incl...

2017-08-20 Thread bradflood
GitHub user bradflood opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/127 isolate and fix issue with PMD Report, includeXmlInSite - invalid xml file for PMD reports with format XML and includeXmlInSite=true, the pmd.xml file copied to the site directory does not

Re: Maven JIRA Projects - Issue Type

2017-08-20 Thread Stephen Connolly
B please, On Sat 19 Aug 2017 at 06:54, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > so based on the feedback I will go back to INFRA and let them configure > a separate Configuration type "Maven Issue Type Scheme" which contains > the issue type "Dependency Upgrade"... > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marb

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 3.1.0

2017-08-20 Thread Evgeny Mandrikov
Hi Robert, In JaCoCo project tested shading of ASM 6.0_BETA that contains module-info (relocation+minimization) jdk1.6.0_45 , apache-maven-3.2.5 jdk1.7.0_80 , apache-maven-3.5.0 jdk1.8.0_144 , apache-maven-3.5.0 jdk-8u152-ea-b05 , apache-maven-3.5.0 jdk-9+181 , apache-maven-3.5.0 Works like char

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #162: SUREFIRE-1384: ProviderInfo for JUnit Plattform (...

2017-08-20 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/162 @britter Actually the master is on JDK6 and the branch junit5 could be on JDK5 that time we created it. Maybe you should fix the enforcer configuration to similar to the one in maste