Hi Guillaume,
+1 from me...
for that fix..
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 11/06/17 00:05, Guillaume Boué wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose MNG-6240 to be added in 3.5.1.
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/commit/e76e217a
IT:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven-i
Hi,
I'd like to propose MNG-6240 to be added in 3.5.1.
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/commit/e76e217a
IT:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven-integration-testing/commit/a162291e
Successful Jenkins build:
https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-3.x-jenkinsfile/job/MNG-6
Wouldn't illegal-access be a run-time 'java' flag only, and not a
compile-time 'javac' one?
Le 10/06/2017 à 19:46, Robert Scholte a écrit :
Hi all,
below is the proposal for the flag "illegal-access" in Java 9.
TLDR; it controls if the compiler should break the build when making
illegal usage
Hi all,
below is the proposal for the flag "illegal-access" in Java 9.
TLDR; it controls if the compiler should break the build when making
illegal usage of internal APIs.
With Java 9 its default value will be 'permit' (not as strict as the
original proposal), but its default value WILL cha
Github user Tibor17 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/153#discussion_r121260609
--- Diff:
surefire-integration-tests/src/test/resources/junit-plattform/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/P
Github user Tibor17 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/153#discussion_r121260527
--- Diff:
surefire-integration-tests/src/test/resources/junit-plattform/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/P
Github user Tibor17 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/153#discussion_r121260260
--- Diff:
surefire-integration-tests/src/test/resources/junit-plattform/src/test/java/junitplattform/BasicTest.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+packag
Github user Tibor17 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/153#discussion_r121260270
--- Diff:
surefire-integration-tests/src/test/resources/junit-plattform/src/test/java/junitplattform/BasicTest.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+packag
Github user Tibor17 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/153#discussion_r121256322
--- Diff:
maven-surefire-common/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/surefire/AbstractSurefireMojo.java
---
@@ -1399,12 +1400,22 @@ private static
Github user Tibor17 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/153#discussion_r121256320
--- Diff:
maven-surefire-common/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/surefire/AbstractSurefireMojo.java
---
@@ -1399,12 +1400,22 @@ private static
Both branches are messy.
3.0-rc1 is pretty old and not working properly because one IT fails.
I wanted to continue on 3.0 two years ago but could not because the plugin
was unstable and the 3.0 Extensions was undefined. The way to have
extensions is clear to me now. Currently now the plugin is able
Pls give me time to read it.
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Benedikt Ritter
wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> any thoughts on this?
>
> Benedikt
>
> Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Do. 8. Juni 2017 um 15:16:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > first of all, I’d like to apologize for not being very active over the
> > past
Hey guys,
any thoughts on this?
Benedikt
Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Do. 8. Juni 2017 um 15:16:
> Hello,
>
> first of all, I’d like to apologize for not being very active over the
> past few months. I’ve been busy at work and there was ApacheCON… so you
> know how it is :-)
>
> I’d like to take
thinking at the IT:
I have a PR in progress [1] to add an API in HawtJNI that will permit to check
how the native library has been loaded
this is expected to be used for a Maven IT once it is integrated...
Regards,
Hervé
[1] https://github.com/fusesource/hawtjni/pull/36
Le samedi 10 juin 201
14 matches
Mail list logo
