Re: New Branch SUREFIRE-1342

2017-03-16 Thread Tibor Digana
Yes, there are a lot of tests 1200 altogether. For instance I have 4 Cores of CPU and the build takes 45 minutes. In your case 1 Core of Virtual CPU which makes the difference. Tuning of JVM is also important. Not too much and not too less of Xmx cca 700 MB and the same or more for permanent part o

Re: New Branch SUREFIRE-1342

2017-03-16 Thread Guillaume Boué
Yes, I finished running the tests multiple times on FreeBSD with Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1, and they are all passing! The tests were however painfully slow (more than 4 hours), it might be an issue with my VM (64 bits, only has 1 Go of RAM and 1 vCPU), I'll see how much time it takes with those same

Re: FYI: on exotic nodes for our CI

2017-03-16 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2017-03-16 um 19:53 schrieb Stephen Connolly: Don't be shooting the messenger! Not my intention. I'm suspecting that it would be a case of sponsoring a node on AWS or rack space or Google's cloud. That would have a static IP, could be isolated from any corporate networks and there you go!

Re: FYI: on exotic nodes for our CI

2017-03-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
Don't be shooting the messenger! I'm suspecting that it would be a case of sponsoring a node on AWS or rack space or Google's cloud. That would have a static IP, could be isolated from any corporate networks and there you go! But anyway, this is more that there is a route available... that the r

RE: FYI: on exotic nodes for our CI

2017-03-16 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Michael Osipov > > Am 2017-03-16 um 13:39 schrieb Stephen Connolly: > > https://reference.apache.org/committer/node-hosting > > > > So if somebody really feels that we need exotic node types... and is > > willing to provide such a node and hook it up... > > T

Re: FYI: on exotic nodes for our CI

2017-03-16 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2017-03-16 um 13:39 schrieb Stephen Connolly: https://reference.apache.org/committer/node-hosting So if somebody really feels that we need exotic node types... and is willing to provide such a node and hook it up... This is somewhat ridiculous. Exotic is HP-UX or AIX, but CentOS, Solaris a

Re: on exotic nodes for our CI

2017-03-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
Achievement "fakespam" unlocked! On Thu 16 Mar 2017 at 12:43, Jason Pyeron wrote: > Cool info. > > But I seriously thought this was a spam message the first 3 times I read > it. > > Subject exotic - check > link - check > 1 sentence body - check > > > -Original Message- > > From: Stephen

RE: on exotic nodes for our CI

2017-03-16 Thread Jason Pyeron
Cool info. But I seriously thought this was a spam message the first 3 times I read it. Subject exotic - check link - check 1 sentence body - check > -Original Message- > From: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 08:39 > To: Maven

FYI: on exotic nodes for our CI

2017-03-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
https://reference.apache.org/committer/node-hosting So if somebody really feels that we need exotic node types... and is willing to provide such a node and hook it up...