Re: [1/2] maven-wagon git commit: [WAGON-474] Upgrade and revise all tests for Jetty 8

2016-12-27 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi What about at least Jetty 9.2? (8.x is not anymore supported) On 26 December 2016 at 10:58, wrote: > Repository: maven-wagon > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/jetty-8 [created] e707a2691 > > > [WAGON-474] Upgrade and revise all tests for Jetty 8 > > * Upgrade all test code to Jetty 8.1.22 a

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Wagon 2.11

2016-12-27 Thread Dan Tran
i still see the same timeout error on the jetty8 branch. No issue at master [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.18.1:test (default-test) on project wagon-http: There was a timeout or other error in the fork -> [Help 1]org.apache.maven.lifecycle.Lifecycle

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Wagon 2.11

2016-12-27 Thread Michael Osipov
Hi Dan, Am 2016-12-25 um 19:51 schrieb Dan Tran: Just want to confirm, your FreeBSD and build.apache.org's ubuntu see the same test failure?? Do you think we should cancel the vote and wait for your fix? I was finally able to complete my coding and testings. After several hours of testing a

Re: [1/2] maven-wagon git commit: [WAGON-474] Upgrade and revise all tests for Jetty 8

2016-12-27 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2016-12-26 um 02:56 schrieb Dan Tran: redhat7/openjdk 7 ( latest) this test fails on timeout. I have seen this issue before not lately. Used to work on 2.9, 2 10, and 2.11) Please add the following to your Surefire config: true -MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSS

Re: svn commit: r1775971 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-pmd-plugin/pom.xml

2016-12-27 Thread Robert Scholte
I will have to analyze that. [1] When working on Jigsaw I had to make clear what's the difference between the two of them: - both are required on the classpath during compilation, but at runtime the provided should already be there ( e.g. servlet-api), optional can be there (springboot depe

Re: svn commit: r1775971 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-pmd-plugin/pom.xml

2016-12-27 Thread Christian Schulte
Am 12/27/16 um 14:48 schrieb Robert Scholte: > IMO scopes weren't designed to make transitive dependencies disappear. Does it mean you would agree that there should be no "provided" scope? Instead "compile+optional" or "runtime+optional" or "test+optional" should be used, where "optional" is just

Re: svn commit: r1775971 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-pmd-plugin/pom.xml

2016-12-27 Thread Robert Scholte
On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 17:07:14 +0100, Christian Schulte wrote: Am 12/26/16 um 11:36 schrieb Robert Scholte: This is becoming a bug versus feature discussion. It shouldn't. Up until now you've made changes which might change the resolution because you've marked them as a bug which must b