[SUREFIRE] Incorporating JUnit 5 surefire provider

2016-10-19 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello, as you might know, JUnit is EPL licensed. However there is currently an effort going on to relicense the surefire provider under ALv2 [1]. It looks like all contributors have accepted the relicensing, so we can incorporate the provider code soon. Would this be okay for the maven community o

Re: svn commit: r1765195 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/site/apt/examples/set-compiler-source-and-target.apt.vm

2016-10-19 Thread Robert Scholte
https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-compiler-plugin/examples/compile-using-different-jdk.html this is for sure a pre-toolchains page and really needs to be rewritten too. Please have a look at other things regarding the maven-compiler-plugin, I want to release it soon. Robert On Wed,

Re: svn commit: r1765195 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/site/apt/examples/set-compiler-source-and-target.apt.vm

2016-10-19 Thread Guillaume Boué
Yes that would be nice. Also, in the same way as there is a note for "target", I thought of adding a note about the usage of "source"; it doesn't guarantee that the code can compile with the specified JDK version. For that, you need to use toolchains (and we can link to the Toolchain Plugin).

Re: Maven 3.4.0 color output and default slf4j implementation

2016-10-19 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le mercredi 19 octobre 2016 13:35:52 Stephen Connolly a écrit : > On 19 October 2016 at 12:37, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > Le lundi 17 octobre 2016 20:58:16 Stephen Connolly a écrit : > > > Could you at least raise the issues that you see as blocking Gossip > > > > against > > > > > it. I presume y

Re: Maven 3.4.0 color output and default slf4j implementation

2016-10-19 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 19 October 2016 at 12:37, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > Le lundi 17 octobre 2016 20:58:16 Stephen Connolly a écrit : > > Could you at least raise the issues that you see as blocking Gossip > against > > it. I presume you have them currently in your context and it would be > good > > to capture them n

Re: Maven 3.4.0 color output and default slf4j implementation

2016-10-19 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le lundi 17 octobre 2016 20:58:16 Stephen Connolly a écrit : > Could you at least raise the issues that you see as blocking Gossip against > it. I presume you have them currently in your context and it would be good > to capture them now so that if somebody can add those features to Gossip > (assum

Re: Some thoughts on Maven 5

2016-10-19 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Hmmm shower thinking now has me pondering if a custom DSL might be > better... something close to human friendly JSON with exceptions for > dependency declaration so that they are always specified as g:a:p:v:c:t > with the optional p and c