[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request #128: Unpack Suffix for parameterized JUnit4Vers...

GitHub user britter opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/128 Unpack Suffix for parameterized JUnit4VersionsIT As discussed in #126 : Pass suffix parameter to unpack method in order to generate separate test workspaces. You can merge this pull request

Re: maven-site-plugin : MSITE-705 inclusion for v3.6 ?

Hi Alix, Thanks for the patch: I'll review it this WE. See you soon at next Paris Hackergarten Meetup :) http://www.meetup.com/fr-FR/Paris-Hackergarten/ If other people near Paris are interested, don't hesitate to come also. And if other Maven devs are involved in equivalent meetings in other

Re: [SUREFIRE] Parameterized Tests for Junit 4 and Junit 5? (Was: [SUREFIRE] JUnit 5 support - how to move things forward?)

Tibor Digana schrieb am Di., 11. Okt. 2016 um 10:01 Uhr: > Both old Jenkins builds [1] already use JDK 8. > So this should not be a problem. > Perfect! I have something put together in a local branch. I think you're going to like it :-) > > [1] > https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-surefire/ >

Re: [SUREFIRE] Hangout with Marc Philipp

Hello Tibor, okay, I will prepare something, after we have integrated the parameterized JUnit4VersionsIT into junit5 branch. Tibor Digana schrieb am Di., 11. Okt. 2016 um 19:50 Uhr: > Sorry for my typos, again: > *Maybe we should setup second trigger in Jenkins build for junir5 branch > and run

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #127: [SUREFIRE-1293] Simplify org.apache.maven.plugin....

Github user britter commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/127 > I fixed this issue where I removed [1] Thank you! > Because of one method in commons-lang3 we should not pass such a big library. ACK > Instead I created

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #126: Make Junit4VersionsIT parameterized

Github user britter commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/126 @Tibor17 Wouldn't it be better to rebase junit5 branch onto master? I don't have push access to maven-surefire, so you would have to do the trick. --- If your project is set up for it, you c

Re: Maven 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT 2016-10-09 and setttings.xml?

Am 10/12/16 um 23:17 schrieb Robert Scholte: > It is a bit different: the *effective* settings are the global settings > where parts can be overridden with the user settings. This means that all > profiles will be there, during build the content of profiles will keep > overriding each other.

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #126: Make Junit4VersionsIT parameterized

Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/126 @britter Finally please merge master to junit5 branch. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe

maven-site-plugin : MSITE-705 inclusion for v3.6 ?

Dear *maven-site-plugin* maintainer, Even if the v3.6 has no release date, most of bugs planned are fixed ... so a release is perhaps "one day in the pipe" (cf. roadmap ). Using a dist

[GitHub] maven-plugins pull request #95: [MSITE-705] Wagon logs displayed only if deb...

GitHub user axel3rd opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/95 [MSITE-705] Wagon logs displayed only if debug mode activated [MSITE-705](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSITE-705) : William Kemper patch + IT inclusion You can merge this pull reques

Re: Maven 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT 2016-10-09 and setttings.xml?

It is a bit different: the *effective* settings are the global settings where parts can be overridden with the user settings. This means that all profiles will be there, during build the content of profiles will keep overriding each other. So is the order of profiles correct in the effectiv

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #122: Specify surefire temp directory for run in multip...

Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/122 @vaimr How it could happen that several parallel Surefire plugins run in parallel within the same Maven module? Maven does not allow this. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #127: [SUREFIRE-1293] Simplify org.apache.maven.plugin....

Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/127 I fixed this issue where I removed [1]. The reason behind is the `IsolatedClassLoader` in plugin process which did not have shaded `commons-lang3` in original jar file of `surefire-common`. B

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #127: [SUREFIRE-1293] Simplify org.apache.maven.plugin....

Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/127 @britter After using one integration tests only `org/apache/**/JUnit47ParallelIT.java` I got same errors as in Jenkins. I think the dependency `commons-lang3` is not propagated

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #127: [SUREFIRE-1293] Simplify org.apache.maven.plugin....

Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/127 Try to clone Surefire master and just run "mvn test" Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/commons/lang3/ObjectUtils at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.repor

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #127: [SUREFIRE-1293] Simplify org.apache.maven.plugin....

Github user britter commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/127 @Tibor17 I don't understand. `mvn clean compile` works. Why does this fail on Jenkins? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub

Project Dependency Trees RFC draft completed

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Project+Dependency+Trees+schema I deem the first draft completed. Please can we get comments from the other Maven Developers as I am sure it is not quite ready for sharing with the other build tool developers yet. -Stephen

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #127: [SUREFIRE-1293] Simplify org.apache.maven.plugin....

Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/127 @britter It seems you forgot to add `ASF commons` dependency. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #127: [SUREFIRE-1293] Simplify org.apache.maven.plugin....

Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/127 @britter The build failed [1]. Did you run a local build on your side? [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-surefire/1638/console --- If your project is set up for it, you can rep

[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request #127: [SUREFIRE-1293] Simplify org.apache.maven....

Github user britter closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/127 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the featur

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #127: [SUREFIRE-1293] Simplify org.apache.maven.plugin....

Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/127 @britter Done --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishe

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #125: Consistently rename JUnit 4.x integration tests

Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/125 @britter Done --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishe

[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request #125: Consistently rename JUnit 4.x integration ...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/125 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature