Hallo,
Recently I encountered a problem with archetype. Here my scenario:
I created a archetype from my existing (multimodal) project. The parent
artifact is called "web".
Starting from this archetype I created a new project with IntelliJ (don't
know if this might make a difference).
I named the
GitHub user axel3rd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/93
[MPIR-349] Bad modules links in 'index/modules' report when
'distributionManagement.site.url' comes from settings.xml
Detail : [MPIR-349](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPIR-349)
You c
Am 09/29/16 um 19:34 schrieb Christian Schulte:
> Am 09/29/16 um 19:13 schrieb Christian Schulte:
>>
>> I fail to come up with anything more appropriate than DNS TXT records to
>> map coordinates/group ids to download locations in combination with
>> DNSSEC. It's exactly the model we are heading af
Am 09/29/16 um 19:13 schrieb Christian Schulte:
>
> I fail to come up with anything more appropriate than DNS TXT records to
> map coordinates/group ids to download locations in combination with
> DNSSEC. It's exactly the model we are heading after. This would make
> signing/hashing superfluous be
Am 09/28/16 um 23:23 schrieb Stephen Connolly:
> So I am seeing conflicting requirements and I am unsure how we should
> approach resolving them:
>
> 1. Seems perfectly reasonable to add some form of integrity details about
> the *project's artifacts* into the PDT. Probably a SHA512 hash...
Adds
