[GitHub] maven-scm pull request #52: add --chache option for git rm

2016-09-10 Thread soiff
GitHub user soiff opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/pull/52 add --chache option for git rm For newer git release, command `git rm` will remove files definitely and it's not possible to add it again by command `git add`. In this scenario, option `--cache` sh

Re: shared: maven-artifact-transfer

2016-09-10 Thread Robert Scholte
On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 17:15:49 +0200, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi Robert, On 10/09/16 16:54, Robert Scholte wrote: Hi Karl Heinz, when looking at Aether it is not aware of a MavenProject. Instead it is transferring Files. Yes I know.. My idea was to have a thin layer on top op (Sonatyp

Re: shared: maven-artifact-transfer

2016-09-10 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Robert, On 10/09/16 16:54, Robert Scholte wrote: Hi Karl Heinz, when looking at Aether it is not aware of a MavenProject. Instead it is transferring Files. Yes I know.. My idea was to have a thin layer on top op (Sonatype/Eclipse) Aether and to avoid too much Maven Core mixin. Yes I ha

Re: shared: maven-artifact-transfer

2016-09-10 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Karl Heinz, when looking at Aether it is not aware of a MavenProject. Instead it is transferring Files. My idea was to have a thin layer on top op (Sonatype/Eclipse) Aether and to avoid too much Maven Core mixin. But it did cross my mind to use the MavenProject as the entity instead of F

shared: maven-artifact-transfer

2016-09-10 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, so after using the maven-artifact-transfer a time I have realized there seemed to be some lack of funcionality from my point of view... My extension[1] will deploy all projects at the end of the session and I had to write down a lot of code to deploy a project...the same meaning for inst

[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request #120: Add convinient method to check for the cur...

2016-09-10 Thread britter
GitHub user britter opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/120 Add convinient method to check for the currently used Java Version You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/britter/maven-surefir

[SUREFIRE] Branch for JUnit 5 integration?

2016-09-10 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, I'm currently a bit stuck with the JUnit 5 integration, because I don't really know where it should be going. At first I thought we should just merge the Integration tests I'm about to write directly to master. But maybe that's not the best idea. But I don't want to implement the whole thing i

Re: Code Style for IntelliJ 2016.2

2016-09-10 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Tibor, that file does not seem to work with IntelliJ 2016.2 :-( I think I will have to configure the code style myself. Benedikt Tibor Digana schrieb am Fr., 9. Sep. 2016 um 15:00 Uhr: > Sorry I did not get notice this email. You need to configure your IDE for > you pending PR in GitHub,

[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request #119: Make JUnit4VersionsIT acutally use the ver...

2016-09-10 Thread britter
GitHub user britter opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/119 Make JUnit4VersionsIT acutally use the versions set by the test code As discussed on the ML. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.

Re: colored console

2016-09-10 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le 10 sept. 2016 12:57, "Hervé BOUTEMY" a écrit : > > Le vendredi 9 septembre 2016 10:49:54 Tibor Digana a écrit : > > @Herve What do you think about Romain's concept: --color-info=blue > > --color-error=red --color-warning=yellow-bold > > @Romain In MVN 3.4 you can override the colors via system

Re: colored console

2016-09-10 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le vendredi 9 septembre 2016 10:49:54 Tibor Digana a écrit : > @Herve What do you think about Romain's concept: --color-info=blue > --color-error=red --color-warning=yellow-bold > @Romain In MVN 3.4 you can override the colors via system properties, e.g. > -Dstyle.info=bold,blue see http://maven.a

Re: Method level parallelization not completing consistently

2016-09-10 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, you know that failsafe is intended for integration tests which are usually not parallelizable... Apart from that maven-eclipse-plugin is retired and shouldn't be part of your build any more... Furthermore without an exmple which shows the behaviour it's hard to guess what might be wron

Method level parallelization not completing consistently

2016-09-10 Thread Prakul Agarwal
Hi, Using Maven 3.3.9, maven-eclipse-plugin 2.9, failsafe 2.19.1, surefire 2.19.1. I'm using FailSafe parallel = method and threadCount ={5,10,50,100} to execute a bunch of test classes with forkCount = {2,3,4,5}. The integration-test phase is completing sometimes and getting stuck for long the o