Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
Here is the Maven change:
https://github.com/michael-o/maven/commit/fd1f665225cea9cdee84cad3de193f771d82e42d
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
Github user rajivpjs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
Which branch should I be looking at and in which project?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
The branch is already in preparation.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user rajivpjs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
That's great. Well done!
I can see only the Aether changes were made. Did you make any Apache Maven
changes? The text "from" in "Downloading from central", how was that appended?
---
If your
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
Here is the Aether change:
https://github.com/michael-o/aether-core/commit/942fc4122d803225c2b465831ef1378bb9946669
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Oops - Disregard that last - a Maven list message arrived while I was in
mid-response to another message, and I hit ‘send’ before noting what message I
was replying to. Sorry about that.
Greg
> On Jul 15, 2016, at 3:52 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
>
> No, there’s no pre-work. Just come interested!
No, there’s no pre-work. Just come interested!
Cheers,
Greg Trasuk
> On Jul 15, 2016, at 3:50 PM, michael-o wrote:
>
> Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
>
>https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
>
>My patch works:
>
>Downloaded from central:
> https://repo.mave
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
My patch works:
Downloaded from central:
https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/sonatype/forge/forge-parent/5/forge-parent-5.pom
(8.4 kB at 55 kB/s)
Downloading from apache.sna
welcome Guillaume!
Regards,
Hervé
Le jeudi 14 juillet 2016 20:57:06 Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> Welcome / Bienvenue!
>
> On 14 July 2016 at 19:10, wrote:
> > Author: gboue
> > Date: Thu Jul 14 09:10:51 2016
> > New Revision: 1752607
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1752607&view=rev
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
You can always watch dev@maven.apache.org.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Could you please let me know what the decision will be, just in case I miss it?
Thanks.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 15 Jul 2016, at 20:08, michael-o wrote:
>
> Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
>
>https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
>
>I just have patched Aether, let's s
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
I just have patched Aether, let's see wether Maven will accept
1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user kwin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/8
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user kwin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/8
This has been merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user rajivpjs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
ok cool. I will wait for your reply.
Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
@rajivpjs I think I know the spot to fix in Aether, though I am not
familiar with the Aether code. Give me 15 min.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Github user rajivpjs closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rajivpjs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
Sure. I will close this for now and will reopen when we know Aether has
reached the appropriate state.
Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
> "Since Aether is currently in transition to us" - what do you mean? Is
Aether going to come to Apache When do you think we will be able to fix this?
I think so, we will at least be able to
Am 07/15/16 um 19:52 schrieb Robert Scholte:
> I think you're right. The main issue here is c:1 is the first closest one,
> but since the c:2 has compile scope, so should c:1. However, that doesn't
> change the scope for transitive dependencies of c:1
>
> A bit off-topic: Where is this scope o
Github user rajivpjs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
"Since Aether is currently in transition to us" - what do you mean? Is
Aether going to come to Apache When do you think we will be able to fix this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can repl
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
This is the snapshot: `Downloading from central:
https://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/maven/maven-embedder/3.4.0-SNAPSHOT/maven-embedder-3.4.0-20160712.211951-154.pom`
Unfortuna
I think you're right. The main issue here is c:1 is the first closest one,
but since the c:2 has compile scope, so should c:1. However, that doesn't
change the scope for transitive dependencies of c:1
A bit off-topic: Where is this scope order specified? In case of custom
scopes we probably
Github user rajivpjs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
In your example, where is the snapshots at the end? Are we saying
repository at index 0, is not correct? If yes, what is the best way to
determine which repository is correct?
---
If your project is
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
Just, it does not work. The list you are using is a static list of ordered
repos to be tried. The first one does not denote the one to be used. From Maven
build:
[INFO]
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
[Squashing commits](http://stackoverflow.com/a/5189600/696632). We have a
complete test set of IT [here](https://maven.apache.org/core-its/). There is a
[bus
load](https://github.com/apache/maven-i
Github user rajivpjs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
What do you mean by squash the commit? Do you have any examples of
Integration tests for Apache way of doing things?
Thanks.
> On 15 Jul 2016, at 18:37, Michael Osipov wrote:
>
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
This looks better. Can you squash the commit? Additionally, this requires
an integration test with three repos: central (by default), and two others.
Preferably file-based. We'd see that this works.
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/11
@AlesRybak Merged. Please close this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user rajivpjs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
I am working on another fix.
Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Hi,
I have a question regarding the description of MNG-4800. Why should the
scope of x be compile? The part "instead of ... x:compile". Is this
really correct? I see no reason why the scope of x should be updated to
compile. It should be kept runtime because it is a runtime dependency of
c no matt
GitHub user AlesRybak opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/11
Fix for ARCHETYPE-504
Simple fix for ARCHETYPE-504, tested manually.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/AlesRybak/maven-ar
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/87
Unusable. `getLocalRepository()` always gives you *your* local repository
on disk. This is not the remote repository Aether is pulling from or pushing
to. Hence, you will always see `...local...:`.
33 matches
Mail list logo