On 1 July 2016 at 12:54, Grzegorz Słowikowski wrote:
> I have some more technical questions.
I'll let the actual Maven developers chip in on those :)
> My second questions is how and where should I describe my modifications?
> Do I need to provide somehow the original source of modified class?
When I was writing my LifecycleExtension recently I hit this same issue,
with the two different logger classes depending on where my common code was
being called from.
I just changed my base code to accept a Consumer and passed in
getLog()::info and the relevant other method from the other logger
Hi Karl Heinz,
I think you should focus on the org.apache.maven.graph.DefaultGraphBuilder
when you're talking about the reactor order.
Robert
On Fri, 01 Jul 2016 19:55:56 +0200, Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
Hi,
I have described two issues within this issue.
First the changed reactor or
Hi,
On 7/1/16 9:03 PM, Christian Schulte wrote:
Am 07/01/16 um 20:11 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi,
wouldn't it make sense to create a branch for Maven 3.5.0 ? And
summarize all changes there ? Makes it more clear ?
Cause there are some issues fixed related to JIRA...for 3.5.0 ?
WDYT ?
Am 07/01/16 um 20:11 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
> Hi,
>
> wouldn't it make sense to create a branch for Maven 3.5.0 ? And
> summarize all changes there ? Makes it more clear ?
>
> Cause there are some issues fixed related to JIRA...for 3.5.0 ?
>
> WDYT ?
>
>
Already done. That's the MNG-60
Hi,
wouldn't it make sense to create a branch for Maven 3.5.0 ? And
summarize all changes there ? Makes it more clear ?
Cause there are some issues fixed related to JIRA...for 3.5.0 ?
WDYT ?
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 7/1/16 9:16 AM, Christian Schulte wrote:
Hi,
I am currently s
Hi,
I also realized that we currently having failing Maven Core IT[1] which
is related to this subject[2]
Kind regards
Karl Heinz
[1]:
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven%20Core%20ITs/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-jdk-1.7/1820/console
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow
Hi,
I have described two issues within this issue.
First the changed reactor order based on using a property for the
version and second the problem related to the version which is used for
artifacts.
At the moment I'm trying to identify the first issue...but currently I'm
a little bit lost.
GitHub user seblm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-shared/pull/13
[MSHARED-562] override default colors with java properties
This pull request allow a user to redefine default maven colors with some
java properties.
For example one can edit his `~/.mav
Hi Karl
On 2016-07-01 14:09, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 7/1/16 1:54 PM, Grzegorz Słowikowski wrote:
>> Thank you very much Stian.
>>
>> I have some more technical questions.
>>
>> 1.
>>
>> When I wrote about using modified class from Maven core I thought about
>> ExecutionEventLogge
Hi,
On 7/1/16 1:54 PM, Grzegorz Słowikowski wrote:
Thank you very much Stian.
I have some more technical questions.
1.
When I wrote about using modified class from Maven core I thought about
ExecutionEventLogger class from maven-embedder
(https://github.com/apache/maven/blob/master/maven-embe
Thank you very much Stian.
I have some more technical questions.
1.
When I wrote about using modified class from Maven core I thought about
ExecutionEventLogger class from maven-embedder
(https://github.com/apache/maven/blob/master/maven-embedder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/cli/event/Executio
Shouldn't this rather be v1.10.0 as there are new features?
/Anders
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 24 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317828&version=12331366
>
> There are still a couple of issues lef
Thanks a lot Karl!
On Friday, 1 July 2016, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> I have taken a the liberty to cut a release
>
> starting the release process. I hope this helps.
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>
> On 6/29/16 6:07 AM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Do you think
Hi Craig,
I have taken a the liberty to cut a release
starting the release process. I hope this helps.
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 6/29/16 6:07 AM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
Do you think you will be able to do a release of maven-scm this week?
I am still receiving queries from Jenki
Hi,
We solved 24 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317828&version=12331366
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SCM%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20priority%
Hi,
I can do this today if you have no objections...
Kind regards
Karl Heinz
On 7/1/16 11:22 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi
I'm on holidays with very limited network
I apologise for delay as I was busy before holidays next week might better.
On Wednesday, 29 June 2016, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi
I'm on holidays with very limited network
I apologise for delay as I was busy before holidays next week might better.
On Wednesday, 29 June 2016, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you think you will be able to do a release of maven-scm this week?
> I am still receiving queries from Jenkins
Github user ptahchiev commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/8
Hi @michael-o can you have a look at this pull-request. I don't have the
rights to have it merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Not sure I completely understand the question, but we've always said that
you shouldn't use another plugin as a dependency. Re-usable logic should be
kept in a library instead.
/Anders
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Christian Schulte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently stumbling upon the following
Hi,
I am currently stumbling upon the following issue. Maven resolves
plugins as if they were a direct dependency of Maven core. That means it
will not consider any 'test' or 'provided' scope dependencies of plugins
when building plugin runtime classpaths. I am not sure if this is the
correct way
21 matches
Mail list logo
