Hey all,
Bit of a crazy, mad, deep-in-bowels-of-maven question for you all.
In our locally published artifacts we've been declaring dependency versions in
a property within our poms:
```xml
1.2.3
...
test
test
${test.version}
```
and that all works fine. When we build projects that
+1
On 7 June 2016 at 22:22, Anders Hammar wrote:
> >
> > Some findings:
> > * pom.properties doesn't include time stamp row (exists in v3.0.0)
> > * MANIFEST.MF does not include Archiver-Version element (exists in
> v3.0.0)
> > - seems to be an intentional change in plexus-archiver 3.3
> >
> > I
The patch I supplied for MJAVADOC-452, 451, 434 and 420 won't be considered for
inclusion? I can recreate the patch off of the latest trunk if it would help
Best regards,
Richard
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 7, 2016, at 2:39 PM, Robert Scholte wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We solved 12 issues:
> htt
GitHub user tomerc opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-shared/pull/11
MJAR-223 - classpathLayoutType is not taken into account when buildinâ¦
â¦g the classpath attribute in the manifest
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
Hi,
We solved 12 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317529&version=12331967&styleName=Text
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012317529%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20key%2
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the
Apache Maven Shared Component: Maven Archiver Version 3.1.0.
https://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-archiver/
The Maven Archiver is mainly used by plugins to handle packaging. The version
numbers referenced in the Since column on th
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Robert Scholte, Hervé Boutemy, Anders Hammar, Karl Heinz Marbaise
PMC quorum: reached.
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
-
Hi,
shared component: maven-artifact-transfer not released yet...cause it's
new...
currently i'm testing other plugins which use it if works everything well...
So we need to prepare maven-artifact-transfer first...
On 6/7/16 2:24 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi
I can have a look next week. I
excellent.. :)
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:24 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi
> I can have a look next week. I think there is a dependency to release as
> well.
> Cheers
> --
> Olivier
> On 7 Jun 2016 01:25, "Jesse McConnell" wrote:
>
> > We are looking t
Hi
I can have a look next week. I think there is a dependency to release as
well.
Cheers
--
Olivier
On 7 Jun 2016 01:25, "Jesse McConnell" wrote:
> We are looking to get Jetty building with java 9 now and are a touch stuck
> with the latest maven-assembly-plugin needing to be released for 3.0.0.
>
> Some findings:
> * pom.properties doesn't include time stamp row (exists in v3.0.0)
> * MANIFEST.MF does not include Archiver-Version element (exists in v3.0.0)
> - seems to be an intentional change in plexus-archiver 3.3
>
> Is the change to pom.properties intentional?
>
I'll answer this myse
Some findings:
* pom.properties doesn't include time stamp row (exists in v3.0.0)
* MANIFEST.MF does not include Archiver-Version element (exists in v3.0.0)
- seems to be an intentional change in plexus-archiver 3.3
Is the change to pom.properties intentional?
I vote 0.
/Anders
On Mon, Jun 6, 2
12 matches
Mail list logo
