well I think this color stuff has already been done differently but never
accepted..
On 2 June 2016 at 16:28, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> another feature that would be great for this release:
> https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/81
>
> I still didn't have time to work on it, but I like the scre
another feature that would be great for this release:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/81
I still didn't have time to work on it, but I like the screenshot
The only thing that I'd like to check is: is tty detection working? ie does
color automatically disappear if there is no tty?
Regards,
+1
this is something that was often seen: this is great that it is fixed!
For example, the last time I published Maven core site, the build simply
failed because of PermgenSpace: now it is working like a charm...
This release will be a must!
Regards,
Hervé
Le mercredi 1 juin 2016 20:12:33 Kar
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestions.
--no-snapshot-updates does not make a difference. I tried out the profiler
and it gives me a breakdown of timings per phase, but it does not have any
timings on what happened before the first phase starts, which is exactly
where the slowdown occurs.
Converting the
GitHub user mkarg opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/86
LinkMojo creates symbolic links to artifacts
This new mojo does the same as the copy mojo, but instead of really moving
bytes around it simply creates symbolic links to the original storage loca
+1
Am 2016-05-29 um 00:23 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi,
We have solved 5 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MSHARED%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20maven-shared-utils-3.0.1
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jq
+1 (non-PMC)
2016-06-01 22:11 GMT+03:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise :
> Hi,
>
> ony more PMC Vote needed ;-).
>
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz
> On 5/29/16 12:23 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have solved 5 issues:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MSHARED%
Hi,
ony more PMC Vote needed ;-).
Kind regards
Karl Heinz
On 5/29/16 12:23 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
Hi,
We have solved 5 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MSHARED%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20maven-shared-utils-3.0.1
There are still a couple of issues le
BTW: What also comes to my mind.
Does the same happen if you ran that project as a freestyle project
instead of Maven Job type (which i assume) ?
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 6/1/16 8:04 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
Hi,
On 6/1/16 10:47 AM, Jorg Heymans wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to
Hi Manfred,
On 6/1/16 12:24 AM, Manfred Moser wrote:
I can feel your excitement coming through in the emails.. ;-)
Of course I'm excited ;-)
...cause it's very important...I have had heard many customers saying
they will not upgrade to newer versions of Maven exactly based on such
issue(s).
Hi,
On 6/1/16 10:47 AM, Jorg Heymans wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to pinpoint a performance issue we are incurring with maven
under Jenkins. Basically what we are seeing is that maven is taking a very
long time getting past the initial 'Scanning for projects' message. As you
can see in below snippet,
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/7
@mryan43 Looks way better now. Please squash, I will test and pull.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user michael-o commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-wagon/pull/22
@wiiitek What do you want to have updated in particular?
We have
https://github.com/apache/maven-wagon/blob/wagon-2.10/wagon-providers/wagon-http/src/main/resources/META-INF/plex
Try: mvn --no-snapshot-updates
Try: https://github.com/takari/maven-profiler
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Jorg Heymans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to pinpoint a performance issue we are incurring with maven
> under Jenkins. Basically what we are seeing is that maven is taking a very
> long ti
GitHub user mryan43 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/10
Fix import order in ArchetypeConfiuration
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/mryan43/maven-archetype fix-imports
Alternati
Github user michael-o commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/7#discussion_r65342854
--- Diff:
maven-archetype-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/archetype/ui/ArchetypeConfiguration.java
---
@@ -19,12 +19,15 @@
* under the L
Github user mryan43 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/7#discussion_r65342161
--- Diff:
maven-archetype-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/archetype/ui/ArchetypeConfiguration.java
---
@@ -19,12 +19,15 @@
* under the Lic
Github user michael-o commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/7#discussion_r65337809
--- Diff:
maven-archetype-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/archetype/ui/ArchetypeConfiguration.java
---
@@ -19,12 +19,15 @@
* under the L
Github user mryan43 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/7
Hi @stain, I have integrated the feedback from @michael-o, let me know if
you need anything else.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Hi,
I am trying to pinpoint a performance issue we are incurring with maven
under Jenkins. Basically what we are seeing is that maven is taking a very
long time getting past the initial 'Scanning for projects' message. As you
can see in below snippet, more than half a minute elapses before the fir
Github user mryan43 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/7#discussion_r65317792
--- Diff:
maven-archetype-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/archetype/ui/ArchetypeConfiguration.java
---
@@ -19,12 +19,15 @@
* under the Lic
Github user michael-o commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/7
@stain I did already in April and wrote how to improve the PR. Nothing has
happened.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
22 matches
Mail list logo