[VOTE] Release Apache Source Release Assembly Descriptor version 1.0.6

2016-05-02 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Hi, In preparation to Apache parent pom version 18, we need a little bugfix on Apache Source Release Assembly Descriptor to fix MPOM-106 We solved 1 issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314621&version=12329542&styleName=Text Staging repo: https://repositor

[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-927] Added support for Test...

2016-05-02 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/9#issuecomment-216382925 @wangxf1030 this way `mvn test -Dconfigfailurepolicy=continue` would work ``` configfailurepolicy

Re: Maven and DevOps

2016-05-02 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I don't really understand yes, http://www.mojohaus.org/development/performing-a-release.html is heavy But if you look at the content, you'll see that: 1. the 3 first sections are about quality expectations, not release, 2. the next 2 are about preparing your environment, 3. then releasing is only

Re: Maven and DevOps

2016-05-02 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 to Jorg's comments ;) I believe what Jorg says is that process is _manual_: - do something NOW (merge PR, write email for vote, ...) - come back after 3 days (and do something more...) (what if you get a baby in between?) Ideally, all you'd need is to start a small snowball: merge the PR, and

Re: [RFC] MJAR-193

2016-05-02 Thread Tibor Digana
Hi, Package binding together with m-manifest-p sound like a bit of packaging, it could be m-shade-p then there as well. But I understand that you want to provide a bigger comfort to the users. Having m-manifest-p would force creation of Manifest and the other like BND plugins to merge the content