Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Doxia version 1.7

2016-02-07 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Hervé, On 2/7/16 6:18 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Maybe the prerequisite should be upgraded to 3.0.5 ? no: prerequisite is about running the result, not about building we could change the enforcer minimum Maven version: that would be the right answer Sure enforcer...;-(... Kind regards Karl H

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Doxia version 1.7

2016-02-07 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
> Maybe the prerequisite should be upgraded to 3.0.5 ? no: prerequisite is about running the result, not about building we could change the enforcer minimum Maven version: that would be the right answer > Do you know if the new release with removed dependency to Xerces will > solve the issue http

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Doxia version 1.7

2016-02-07 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, in summary +1 from me... Details: check SHA1 Ok... Checked to build with Maven 2.2.1 => Does not work (really not a problem...)... [INFO] The projects in the reactor contain a cyclic reference: Edge between 'Vertex{label='org.apache.maven.doxia:doxia-core'}' and 'Vertex{label='org.apach

Re: migrating Surefire to 3.0-RC1

2016-02-07 Thread Tibor Digana
Thx and it seems the deprecated ArtifactFactory can be substituted with RepositorySystem as well. There's the last failing IT which needs to be resolved Surefire141PluggableProvidersIT. And then we need to fix the maven-surefire-common with maven-artifact-transfer, because I avoided relocation in c

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: maven-plugins » Apache Maven Source Plugin #5050

2016-02-07 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Robert, could be (I'm not sure) ...but i have released it to central..if there is a problem..so we can simply cut a new release... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 2/7/16 3:51 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: Wasn't 3.0.3 simply staged and dropped? Op Sun, 07 Feb 2016 12:26:41 +0100 schreef

Re: migrating Surefire to 3.0-RC1

2016-02-07 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Tibor, Those mentioned are real components, they are injected as if they were annoted with @Inject. I don't think you need metadatasource, while refactoring other plugins I could get rid of it. Robert Op Sun, 07 Feb 2016 13:44:59 +0100 schreef Tibor Digana : Hi Robert, I already

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: maven-plugins » Apache Maven Source Plugin #5050

2016-02-07 Thread Robert Scholte
Wasn't 3.0.3 simply staged and dropped? Op Sun, 07 Feb 2016 12:26:41 +0100 schreef Hervé BOUTEMY : even if 3.0.3 has a bug, it should be on central, isn't it? or is it a deliberate choice not to publish it to central? Regards, Hervé Le samedi 6 février 2016 12:03:32 Karl Heinz Marbaise a

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: maven-plugins » Apache Maven Source Plugin #5050

2016-02-07 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, I have uploaded plexus-archiver 3.0.2, 3.0.3 to central... If there is a regression in 3.0.3 we make an other release...but my tests with maven-assembly-plugin do not look like this..(may be i'm wrong)... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 2/7/16 1:08 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi

Re: migrating Surefire to 3.0-RC1

2016-02-07 Thread Tibor Digana
Hi Robert, I already updated some @Component-s with @Parameter. Few components still remain. How these can be used with @Parameter? @Component private ArtifactResolver artifactResolver; @Component private ToolchainManager toolchainManager; @Component private RepositorySystem repositorySystem;

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: maven-plugins » Apache Maven Source Plugin #5050

2016-02-07 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Hervé, On 2/7/16 12:26 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: even if 3.0.3 has a bug, it should be on central, isn't it? Sure it should be...no doubt... or is it a deliberate choice not to publish it to central? I don't know... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise Regards, Hervé Le samedi 6 février

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: maven-plugins » Apache Maven Source Plugin #5050

2016-02-07 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
even if 3.0.3 has a bug, it should be on central, isn't it? or is it a deliberate choice not to publish it to central? Regards, Hervé Le samedi 6 février 2016 12:03:32 Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit : > Hi Hervé, > > Kristian wrote to me that he has found an regression and he will try to > underst

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Doxia version 1.7

2016-02-07 Thread Petar Tahchiev
+1 from me too. Great work Herve. 2016-02-06 22:42 GMT+02:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise : > Hi, > > On 2/6/16 8:51 PM, Andreas Gudian wrote: > >> +1 from me, although I had to remove the DEPENDENCIES file form the >> source-zip in order to build it (the rat-config doesn't have an exclusion >> for the f