Hi,
can someone take a look at that build node, please. Jenkins is currently
sending out emails about failing ITs not failing locally here. I think
the root cause for this is the following exception right at the start of
the ITs. Setting -Djava.io.tmpdir to point to somewhere inside the
works
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really wonder why it is useful to add a skip-parameter to the packaging
> plugin? The goal for every Maven project is to end up with some (packaged)
> artifact, right?
> A skip-parameter because a lot of other plugins have it as we
GitHub user manouti opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/9
Add properties to enable or disable generation of submodules.
By setting -DgenerateEnableProperties=true when calling the
create-from-project goal, the plugin would create enabler properties
Github user michael-o commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/70#issuecomment-174671286
This is what I have expected you to say ;-)
@barthel or anyone else, can you craft up an IT for that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Github user jvanzyl commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/70#issuecomment-174668942
For a feature like that there should be an integration test as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user michael-o commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/70#issuecomment-174666838
@jvanzyl There are unit tests in the commit. Isn't that enough? Otherwise,
I'd ask @barthel for it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user jvanzyl commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/70#issuecomment-174664828
If there are integration tests don't wait for me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user pSub commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/70#issuecomment-174664718
I would appreciate a merge, too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Am 2016-01-25 um 20:51 schrieb Robert Scholte:
Hi,
I really wonder why it is useful to add a skip-parameter to the
packaging plugin? The goal for every Maven project is to end up with
some (packaged) artifact, right?
A skip-parameter because a lot of other plugins have it as well is IMHO
not a g
Github user michael-o commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/70#issuecomment-174656884
Can we make any progress here?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
2016-01-25 21:39 GMT+01:00 Robert Scholte :
> Op Mon, 25 Jan 2016 21:05:58 +0100 schreef Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>
> Nothing prevents to build 2 or more wars with slightly different resources.
>> Being able to skip one would be useful.
>>
>
> That should mean different artif
Op Mon, 25 Jan 2016 21:05:58 +0100 schreef Romain Manni-Bucau
:
Nothing prevents to build 2 or more wars with slightly different
resources.
Being able to skip one would be useful.
That should mean different artifactIds (and groupIds or versions?), so
different projects/modules. And you a
Op Mon, 25 Jan 2016 20:54:20 +0100 schreef Aldrin Leal
:
There are cases where one could use a profile to build a custom assembly
of
the war (say, like with jetty runner to run under a given paas), and
attaching just the relevant classes / assets, thus saving time.
Custom assembly profile,
Nothing prevents to build 2 or more wars with slightly different resources.
Being able to skip one would be useful.
Le 25 janv. 2016 20:58, "Robert Scholte" a écrit :
> Op Mon, 25 Jan 2016 20:55:09 +0100 schreef jieryn :
>
> UAT module which is war for easy overlay of the main WAR module but
>> w
Op Mon, 25 Jan 2016 20:55:09 +0100 schreef jieryn :
UAT module which is war for easy overlay of the main WAR module but
without double-pushing your (fat) war into the upstream repository?
Both install:install and deploy:deploy have skip parameters for that
reason. AFAIK overlay still needs
There are cases where one could use a profile to build a custom assembly of
the war (say, like with jetty runner to run under a given paas), and
attaching just the relevant classes / assets, thus saving time.
--
-- Aldrin Leal, / http://about.me/aldrinleal
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Rober
UAT module which is war for easy overlay of the main WAR module but
without double-pushing your (fat) war into the upstream repository?
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really wonder why it is useful to add a skip-parameter to the packaging
> plugin? The goal for
Hi,
I really wonder why it is useful to add a skip-parameter to the packaging
plugin? The goal for every Maven project is to end up with some (packaged)
artifact, right?
A skip-parameter because a lot of other plugins have it as well is IMHO
not a good reason, so what would be a valid useca
GitHub user adangel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/80
[MPMD-219] PMD processing errors should fail build (skipPmdError=false)
This commit adds a "PmdCollectingRenderer" and uses it instead of
the report listener, as listeners are unfortunately
19 matches
Mail list logo