[ANN] Apache Maven Shade Plugin 2.4.3 Released

2016-01-10 Thread Tibor Digana
Hi, The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven Shade Plugin, version 2.4.3 The release contains 4 bug fixes. Again we received contributions from the community in form of bug reports and bug fixes. Thank you and keep them coming! https://maven.apache.org/plugins

[ANN] Apache Maven Shade Plugin 2.4.3 Released

2016-01-10 Thread Tibor Digana
Hi, The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven Shade Plugin, version 2.4.3 The release contains 4 bug fixes. Again we received contributions from the community in form of bug reports and bug fixes. Thank you and keep them coming! https://maven.apache.org/plugins

[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: SUREFIRE-1216: TEST-*.xml files gener...

2016-01-10 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/110 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 2.4.3

2016-01-10 Thread Tibor Digana
just a test: not sure if I receive this in my gmail mailbox... -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/RESULT-VOTE-Release-Apache-Maven-Shade-Plugin-version-2-4-3-tp5858745p5858773.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ---

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 2.4.3

2016-01-10 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Tibor, So jie...@gmail.com is Jesse Farinacci ? If so than i have mistaken that... On 1/10/16 7:19 PM, Tibor Digana wrote: Jesse, Email for you, since I missed your email in TO while sending the summary, see *dev@maven.apache.org * mailing list. I guess you di

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 2.4.3

2016-01-10 Thread Tibor Digana
Jesse, Email for you, since I missed your email in TO while sending the summary, see *dev@maven.apache.org * mailing list. I guess you did not receive my previous email, thanks for your vote and testing this plugin. Cheers Tibor On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 2.4.3

2016-01-10 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, On 1/10/16 6:20 PM, Tibor Digana wrote: The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Tibor Digaňa, Michael Osipov, Kristian Roselvold, Hervé BOUTEMY +1 (non-binding): Jesse Farinacci, Mirko Friedenhagen I think you missed jie...@gmail.com... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marba

Re: [DISCUSS] MDEPLOY-205: MavenProject with only attachments must have packaging "pom"

2016-01-10 Thread Robert Scholte
Op Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:14:03 +0100 schreef Hervé BOUTEMY : perhaps there are artifacts in central, that are not built with Maven and don't have corresponding Maven artifact handlers but I suppose this check is only when maven-deploy-plugin will deploy to a repo, isn't it? Indeed, and I e

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 2.4.3

2016-01-10 Thread Tibor Digana
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Tibor Digaňa, Michael Osipov, Kristian Roselvold, Hervé BOUTEMY 0 : none -1 : none. PMC quorum: accomplished. I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. I will add the release to the next board report. Cheers Tibor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 2.4.3

2016-01-10 Thread Tibor Digana
The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Tibor Digaňa, Michael Osipov, Kristian Roselvold, Hervé BOUTEMY +1 (non-binding): Jesse Farinacci, Mirko Friedenhagen On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Tibor Digana wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 4 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jir

Re: [DISCUSS] MDEPLOY-205: MavenProject with only attachments must have packaging "pom"

2016-01-10 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
perhaps there are artifacts in central, that are not built with Maven and don't have corresponding Maven artifact handlers but I suppose this check is only when maven-deploy-plugin will deploy to a repo, isn't it? When a project is built with Maven, this requirement of having one main artifact

Re: End Of Life Apache Maven 2.x

2016-01-10 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Tibor, On 1/6/16 5:05 PM, Tibor Digana wrote: Hi devs, Do we have CMS for this page? http://maven.apache.org/maven-2.x-eol.html It should also be available via the CMS (as far as i know)...but can be found under the usual svn site: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/site/trunk in cont

Re: [DISCUSS] MDEPLOY-205: MavenProject with only attachments must have packaging "pom"

2016-01-10 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Tibor, no need to debug, I can read (and do understand) what's happening and IMHO those tests are not reasonable. Of course I'm aware that some IT are simplified versions just for testing purpose, but why would anyone create a war-project without the war (only as attachment)? All I'm loo

Re: [DISCUSS] MDEPLOY-205: MavenProject with only attachments must have packaging "pom"

2016-01-10 Thread Tibor Digana
Even if they are not real world ITs they are reasonable tests. Did you debug the plugin? In cases like this I am always debugging the code. On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > that's all handled by the ArtifactHandler, which knows how to translate > the packaging and type to