Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven JAR Utilities version 1.2

2016-01-02 Thread Benson Margulies
+1 On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2015-12-31 um 21:30 schrieb Michael Osipov: >> >> Hi, >> >> We solved 5 issues: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12334441 >> >> >> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven JAR Utilities version 1.2

2016-01-02 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2015-12-31 um 21:30 schrieb Michael Osipov: Hi, We solved 5 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12334441 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=component%20%3D%20maven-shared-jar%20AND

[GitHub] maven pull request: [MNG-5947] dependencyManagement import section...

2016-01-02 Thread michael-o
Github user michael-o commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/74#issuecomment-168405448 Now I see, the `Optional´ comes from Guava and not from Java. I think the likelyhood is higher w/o a model change. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply

[GitHub] maven pull request: [MNG-5947] dependencyManagement import section...

2016-01-02 Thread akacme
Github user akacme commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/74#issuecomment-168404937 In other words - will it go to Maven 3.x when there is no modification to the model itself? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

[GitHub] maven pull request: [MNG-5947] dependencyManagement import section...

2016-01-02 Thread akacme
Github user akacme commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/74#issuecomment-168403276 Code has been compiled using Java 7. Model has been enhanced to store graph of imports in dependency management section - I can rewrite it to store it elsewhere, but such s

[GitHub] maven pull request: [MNG-5947] dependencyManagement import section...

2016-01-02 Thread michael-o
Github user michael-o commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/74#issuecomment-168402507 You are using Java 8 features which we can't accept. Java 7 only. The model is changed. I would opt-in for that not before Maven 4. --- If your project is set up for it

Re: [Jigsaw] Apache Maven status update

2016-01-02 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Hi, Great news! Notice that source parsing is not so crucial noawadays, since we use java 5 annotations in general, both for plexus/sisu and plugin-tools: if you deactivate javadoc parsing, you should avoid the issue. This xould permit work in parallel: - continue Jigsaw tests - fix the QDox s