Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.8

2015-11-02 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Amazing flute section ! ROFL :) K 2015-11-02 23:46 GMT+01:00 Jason van Zyl : > One more time > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ry4ngf766N0 > > > On Nov 2, 2015, at 7:26 AM, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Well I was asked to remove the quick and dirty chec

[MNG-3092] merge/commit buddy needed

2015-11-02 Thread Uwe Barthel
My PR for “Adds version range result filter behaviour” (https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/70) is ready for merging and needs a willing committer to merge into master. Please take a look and leave a comment if I could support the merging somehow. mit freundlichen Grüßen Uwe Barthel -- bart..

Re: Maven Release Version Policy

2015-11-02 Thread Uwe Barthel
> ok, then what could be done is only a check afterwards that the version > chosen > by the user is consistent with measures on code evolutions So we are back on version policy I think. Only check and stop the release based on the policy. > another idea: perhaps we should have the API propose mu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Components POM Version 22

2015-11-02 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 PMC quorum ok :) Regards, Hervé Le samedi 31 octobre 2015 21:48:28 Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit : > Hi, > > JIRA Reference: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311250&ve > rsion=12328931 > > Changes since the last release: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/mave

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.8

2015-11-02 Thread Jason van Zyl
One more time https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ry4ngf766N0 > On Nov 2, 2015, at 7:26 AM, Stephen Connolly > wrote: > > Well I was asked to remove the quick and dirty check of "is it a > version range" which lead to: > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven.git;a=blobdiff;f=maven-m

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Components POM Version 22

2015-11-02 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, here is my +1... here is a need for at least one binding VOTE... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 10/31/15 9:48 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, JIRA Reference: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311250&version=12328931 Changes since the last release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Components POM Version 22

2015-11-02 Thread Benson Margulies
+1 On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > JIRA Reference: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311250&version=12328931 > > Changes since the last release: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/shared/tags/maven-shared-components-22/pom

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.8

2015-11-02 Thread Stephen Connolly
Well I was asked to remove the quick and dirty check of "is it a version range" which lead to: https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven.git;a=blobdiff;f=maven-model-builder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/model/building/DefaultModelBuilder.java;h=ab00fef6d533c03a8e7bafc714450a663f320518;hp

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.8

2015-11-02 Thread Robert Scholte
IIRC, somebody provided a patch to remove this if-statement. Not sure if it was applied. Robert Verzonden vanaf Samsung Mobile. Oorspronkelijk bericht Van: Stephen Connolly Datum:02-11-2015 04:18 (GMT-08:00) Aan: Maven Developers List Onderwerp: Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.8 h

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.8

2015-11-02 Thread Stephen Connolly
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven.git;a=commit;h=19532849 is the fix On 2 November 2015 at 12:05, Stephen Connolly wrote: > -1 technical > > mng5840ParentVersionRanges(ParentRangeRelativePathPointsToWrongVersion)OK > (5.6 s) > mng5840ParentVersionRanges(ParentRangeRelativePathPoin

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.8

2015-11-02 Thread Stephen Connolly
-1 technical mng5840ParentVersionRanges(ParentRangeRelativePathPointsToWrongVersion)OK (5.6 s) mng5840ParentVersionRanges(ParentRangeRelativePathPointsToCorrectVersion)OK (0.4 s) mng5840RelativePathReactorMatching(RelativePathPointsToWrongVersion)FAILURE (0.4 s) On 2 November 2015 at 11:48, Ste

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.8

2015-11-02 Thread Stephen Connolly
Hmmm I may have to change my vote, looking like there is a regression on the MNG-5840 fix from 3.3.6-SNAPSHOT On 30 October 2015 at 17:38, Stephen Connolly wrote: > +1 technical - works on my critical big build > +1 legal umbrella - on the diff of this since 3.3.7 (thankfully only 1 > commit to r