Github user kpiwko commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/2#issuecomment-142831231
@Tibor17 SPI would work for me. Basically any means how to get the
information about Maven process to forked JVM would be helpful, if enabled by
default, even bette
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Jason van Zyl, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Olivier Lamy, Kristian
Rosenvold, Benson Margulies, Hervé Boutemy
+1 (non binding): Tibor Digana, Dan Tran
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
-
here is my +1
Regards,
Hervé
Le dimanche 20 septembre 2015 23:06:40 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 13 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311250&ve
> rsion=12329010
>
> Changes since the last release:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/po
Github user lamyaa commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/102#issuecomment-142768756
@Tibor17 I haven't had a chance to look at junit47 provider yet. I'm hoping
to get to it (as well as surefire-1144) this weekend.
---
If your project is set up f
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/96#issuecomment-142758232
@lamyaa
Did you have time to run this test using the fix we talked about in
`SUREFIRE-1144`?
Is the execution time calculation broken ?
If it is not b
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/2#issuecomment-142749714
@kpiwko
@gastaldi
@marcusholl
What can we do about this old issue?
My suggestion is to propose SPI in Surefire 3.x where hacking system
propertie
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/102#issuecomment-142747818
Hi @lamyaa
What should we do with this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/105#issuecomment-142740267
@juherr
Please consider these integration tests as a hint.
These are typical tests using `parallel` parameter.
`CheckTestNgGroupThreadParallelIT`
Op Sun, 20 Sep 2015 19:27:55 +0200 schreef Stuart McCulloch
:
PS. the following test projects use an explicit source+target level of
1.5 which need updating to 1.6 to pass on jdk9:
core-it-suite/src/test/resources/mng-3203/pom.xml
core-it-suite/src/test/resources/mng-5338/project/pom.xml
co
