Darn, my fix required Java 6.
Thoughts?
-D
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
> Let's roll back Kristians changes, and add them back after 1.10.1 release
>
> Thanks
>
> -D
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Robert Scholte
> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to use 3.0 for a huge cleanup
Let's roll back Kristians changes, and add them back after 1.10.1 release
Thanks
-D
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Robert Scholte
wrote:
> I'd like to use 3.0 for a huge cleanup and some new features. That might
> take a while
> I'd suggest to either role back Kristians change or create a b
I'd like to use 3.0 for a huge cleanup and some new features. That might
take a while
I'd suggest to either role back Kristians change or create a branch from
1.10
Robert
Op Thu, 16 Apr 2015 21:12:34 +0200 schreef Dan Tran :
I dont mind waiting for 3.0. do you have ETA for 3.0?
Thanks
-
I dont mind waiting for 3.0. do you have ETA for 3.0?
Thanks
-Dan
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> when would you like to start, cause i would like to get a single fix[2] in
> there as well...
>
> If you start a release it would be a 3.0.0 release cau
Hi Dan,
when would you like to start, cause i would like to get a single fix[2]
in there as well...
If you start a release it would be a 3.0.0 release cause it is lifted to
Java 6 already...see [1] and not 1.10.1 anymore...
or do we need a 1.10.1 release instead ?
[1]:
http://mail-archiv
No problem, I have done it before. Just want to ask
Thanks
-D
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On 4/16/15 8:05 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
>
>> Hi Karl Heinz
>>
>> Could you help to release this plugin? Since you just flawlessly do it so
>> well :)
>>
>
> Wh
Hi Karl,
> The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
> Maven Verifier Plugin, version 1.1
Congratulations on the release. Out of curiosity, I was wondering...
What is the purpose of the maven-verifier-plugin, compared to the
maven-enforcer-plugin? From the Verifier p
Hi Dan,
On 4/16/15 8:05 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
Hi Karl Heinz
Could you help to release this plugin? Since you just flawlessly do it so
well :)
What is the exact problem?
description how to do a release is described here:
http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-project-release-procedu
Hi Karl Heinz
Could you help to release this plugin? Since you just flawlessly do it so
well :)
Thanks
-Dan
Yes it is exactly the option Brian presented to us.
For me (perhaps it's name is misleading) the -platform is the option that
allows to compile mvjars (partial code on top of default one).
But I agree that it's not clear the relationship/constraint/control between
source/target/platform
On Thu, A
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the
Apache Maven Verifier Plugin, version 1.1
Useful for integration tests - verifies the existence of certain
conditions.
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-verifier-plugin/
Please be aware of the new location of our issue tracker
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the
Apache Maven JavaDoc Plugin, version 2.10.3
The Javadoc Plugin uses the Javadoc tool to generate javadocs for the
specified project.
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-javadoc-plugin
Please be aware of the new location of our i
Today I received this message from the core-libs-dev mailing list by
Joseph D. Darcy
{quote}
Note that one possible feature of JDK 9 is a -platform N option to javac
which would allow compiling against older versions of the platform
libraries:
JEP draft: Compile for Specific Platform Vers
Just a heads up I'm rolling the release primarily to fix the issue of core
extensions not working with authenticated repos. Jan is also working on test
cases for the duplicated user agent header, so I expect we'll release a 3.3.3
shortly as well.
Thanks,
Jason
---
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> I thought the multi-versioned JAR had a different ambition, namely
> delta-snapshots.
> I guess that only a fragment of classes should be deployed in muti-version
> JAR due to we have already deployed previous timestamp and thus current
> sn
15 matches
Mail list logo
