[GitHub] maven-scm pull request: SCM-706 finer-grained handling of file ren...

2015-04-14 Thread sergei-ivanov
GitHub user sergei-ivanov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/pull/31 SCM-706 finer-grained handling of file rename status for gitexe provider... ..., rename source is not added to the set of files for commit operation anymore This is an actualisation

Re: Maven Web Site

2015-04-14 Thread Mark Derricutt
On 14 Apr 2015, at 18:34, Olivier Lamy wrote: > wow, impressive! > Definitely agree!!! A third on that! That's tempting me to _actually_ use maven sites. -- Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt http://twitter.com/tali

Re: Maven Web Site

2015-04-14 Thread Mark Derricutt
On 14 Apr 2015, at 18:50, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > no secret: 1920x1200 = good screen for a desktop, Do you always run your browser full screen? I don't. -- Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt http://twitter.com/t

Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

2015-04-14 Thread Paul Benedict
In addition, even if IDEs were to support the MVJAR spec, that doesn't answer how Maven should natively answer the spec. Relying on IDE support isn't a good total answer, but it is a good complimentary answer. Maven just has to answer it with configuration and command line tooling too. Cheers, Pa

Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

2015-04-14 Thread Carlos Sanchez
My 0.02 The current approach to use multiple modules, poms,... is a pita and mvjar would fix that, while bringing new interesting problems such as testing the possible combinations. But that is ok. Lack of IDE support shouldn't stop us, if it is useful for maven users that may push the IDEs If t

Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

2015-04-14 Thread Paul Benedict
I don't see this as "forcing" to create modules. This is purely a packaging issue, not a programming issue. Rather than providing distinct jars per the Java version you're targeting (which people have done for years when needed), you're just binding things up at the end. Forget this is about the MV

Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

2015-04-14 Thread Jeff MAURY
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY > wrote: > > > Le lundi 13 avril 2015 12:19:57 Paul Benedict a écrit : > > > This is the example project structure I had in mind: > > > > > > mvjar-example/ > > >minjava/ > > > src/

Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

2015-04-14 Thread Arnaud Héritier
For now yes it is probably the only solution but the JCP should work with IDE teams to have this solved. I don't want to see Maven doing crappy stuffs because of IDEs There are already a lot of limitations in IDE (at least some of them) compared to Maven like the ability to have several classpaths

Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

2015-04-14 Thread Stephen Connolly
Actually this is worse. This would be Maven forcing us to create modules because IDEs do not support different JDK levels for source code paths in the one module On 14 April 2015 at 09:32, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY > wrote: > > > Le lundi 13 avril 2

Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

2015-04-14 Thread Arnaud Héritier
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Jörg Schaible < joerg.schai...@swisspost.com> wrote: > Hi Arnaud, > > Arnaud Héritier wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Jörg Schaible > > wrote: > > [snip] > > >> IMHO, mvjars will create a bigger maintenance mess than the current > >> solutions. > >

Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

2015-04-14 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Arnaud, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Jörg Schaible > wrote: [snip] >> IMHO, mvjars will create a bigger maintenance mess than the current >> solutions. >> > > I don't know. I think it really depends if your are provider or consumer > of mvjars. If you are cons

Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

2015-04-14 Thread Arnaud Héritier
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Arnaud, > > Arnaud Héritier wrote: > > > In short/middle term the lack of IDE integration isn't a real problem for > > now. > > Like Brian said, they know that users won't use such feature before > > several years. > > The runtime part p

Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

2015-04-14 Thread Arnaud Héritier
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > Le lundi 13 avril 2015 12:19:57 Paul Benedict a écrit : > > This is the example project structure I had in mind: > > > > mvjar-example/ > >minjava/ > > src/main/java > > src/test/java > >java7/ > > src/main/java > >

Re: Maven Web Site

2015-04-14 Thread Olivier Lamy
On 14 April 2015 at 16:50, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > Le mardi 14 avril 2015 16:34:18 Olivier Lamy a écrit : > > On 14 April 2015 at 16:11, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > > wow, impressive! > > > > Definitely agree!!! > > > > > what I don't like is that it does not use my wide screen, which is not > > > g

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Verifier Plugin version 1.1

2015-04-14 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Karl Heinz Marbaise, Hervé Boutemy, Oliver Lamy +1 (non binding): none I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise - To u