I'll integrate and try to fix a couple things and roll again shortly.
On Mar 11, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Time to release Maven 3.3.0!
>
> Here is a link to Jira with 22 issues resolved:
> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=21012
>
Hi,
We solved 9 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11310&version=17078
There are still one issue left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MDOAP%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
Staging repo:
https://repository.
just FYI - all Tycho ITs are passing fine using staged maven 3.3.0
Regards,
Jan
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:ja...@takari.io]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 11. März 2015 23:57
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.0 Release
>
> Hi,
>
> Time to release Maven 3
Hi Stephen,
Yes the MavenSession has a list of reactor projects...that was not the
point...
I thought having a more convenient way to set properties for all modules
in a build (multi module build)...
I used the list of reactor projects to go through the list like
buildnumber-maven-plugin d
MavenSession has(/had?) the reactor projects
On 12 March 2015 at 09:19, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi Kristian,
>
> first thanks for your answer...
>
> based on what i've seen there seemed to be no such reactor-wdie map
> available ? May be Jason knows more ?
>
> Thanks
> Kind regards
> Karl H
Hi Kristian,
first thanks for your answer...
based on what i've seen there seemed to be no such reactor-wdie map
available ? May be Jason knows more ?
Thanks
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 3/12/15 10:16 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
The behaviour is "intended". I am not sure if there is
The behaviour is "intended". I am not sure if there is any reactor-wide map
that is available anywhere.
Kristian
2015-03-11 17:10 GMT+01:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise :
> Hi,
>
> currently i have the problem creating a plugin which adds some
> properties...to the current project...
>
> @Parame
Github user jvanzyl commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/32#issuecomment-78283012
No, and I would not advocate the use of tools like that which would distort
the standard lifecycle and promote tools like Jacoco that do not require things
like that. As a
Github user ChristianSchulte commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/32#issuecomment-78281257
@jvanzyl: You would not want the `test-jar` goal to package compiled test
classes instrumented by some reporting tool, would you ? So the forking logic
needs to ch
