>
> I don't understand why http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5767 was
> integrated without a windows support ? For me it is everything or nothing.
I agree. All features of Maven should be available on all supported
platforms. And Windows is one of them [1].
[1] http://maven.apache.org/download
I had a quick look at the changeling and I'm +1 for a 3.3.0 with
improvements like the toolchain integration and few others
I'm far from the project and won't veto anything as I have no time for it
but I don't understand why http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5767 was
integrated without a windows
On 25 Feb 2015, at 4:06, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> based on the list of changes i would suggest to make a 3.3.0 instead of
> 3.2.6to make clear something is introduced
+1 on 3.3.0 here. Bring on the changes!
Mark
--
Mark Derricutt
http://www.theoryinpractice.net
http://www.chaliceo
Github user josephw closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/37
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
The Apache Source Release Assembly Descriptor team is pleased to
announce the apache-source-release-assembly-descriptor-1.0.5 release!
This jar contains a customized source assembly descriptor to produce
Apache compliant source bundles.
http://maven.apache.org/apache-resource-bundles/
Changes in
Github user ChristianSchulte commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/32#issuecomment-75848081
I am still convinced that it is a good idea to allow Maven 3 'mvn
site-deploy' to work the same way as Maven 2. What's the issue with that ?
---
If your project i
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Dennis Lundberg, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Kristian Rosenvold
Thanks for reviewing this release!
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 2 issues:
Hi,
currently i'm working one maven-enforcer issues...in particular
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-222
so after diving into it i found that after chanes in
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-156 caused the problem...
What i don't understand at the moment is that if i readd th
+1
24. feb. 2015 19:44 skrev "Karl Heinz Marbaise" :
> Hi Dennis,
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>
> On 2/21/15 8:47 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We solved 2 issues:
>> * Use instead of which has never
>> worked for maven-assembly-plugin
>> * MASFRES-9 Add pr
Hi Dennis,
+1 from me.
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 2/21/15 8:47 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi,
We solved 2 issues:
* Use instead of which has never
worked for maven-assembly-plugin
* MASFRES-9 Add pre-defined descriptor in
apache-source-release-assembly-descriptor for tarball-only
Github user jvanzyl commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/32#issuecomment-75814137
I thought we agreed you were closing this pull request.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user jvanzyl commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/32#issuecomment-75814030
No, I don't think it's a good idea to be honest.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user ChristianSchulte commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/32#issuecomment-75794059
Regarding the recent discussion about releasing 3.2.6 as 3.3.0: Could this
be part of 3.3.0, please ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
+1 from me
Den 21 feb 2015 20:47 skrev "Dennis Lundberg" :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 2 issues:
> * Use instead of which has never
> worked for maven-assembly-plugin
> * MASFRES-9 Add pre-defined descriptor in
> apache-source-release-assembly-descriptor for tarball-only
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repo
Hi,
based on the list of changes i would suggest to make a 3.3.0 instead of
3.2.6to make clear something is introduced
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 2/24/15 3:24 PM, Anders Hammar wrote:
A question was raised the otehr day if this shouldn't rather be v3.3.0, as
it seems to be ne
A question was raised the otehr day if this shouldn't rather be v3.3.0, as
it seems to be new functionality rather than bug fixes. Your call though.
/Anders
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Ok, so it's been over 3 weeks :-) I have two branches I'm going to rebase
> and co
Ok, so it's been over 3 weeks :-) I have two branches I'm going to rebase and
commit to master before I start the roll out for 3.2.6. I haven't seen any
activity but if you'd like to get anything in let me know as the current plan
is to try and cut the release Thursday or Friday. But in jason-ti
17 matches
Mail list logo
