Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/84
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
+1 SHA1SUM matches, tested with some projects.
Regards Mirko
--
http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/
https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen)
https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 15 issue
+1
On Jan 31, 2015, at 2:05 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 15 issues:
> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11140&version=20775
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPMD-186?jql=project%20%3D%20MPMD%20AND
Hi,
We solved 15 issues:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11140&version=20775
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPMD-186?jql=project%20%3D%20MPMD%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
Stagi
Le samedi 31 janvier 2015 11:25:55 sebb a écrit :
> On 31 January 2015 at 01:33, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> > As every ASF project, Apache Maven regularly reports to the Apache board
> > about the status of the project. Our latest report (January 21st, 2014)
> > is shown below:
> >
> > Apache Maven i
We will soon find out. Continuous Delivery here we come.
On Jan 31, 2015, at 6:23 AM, Anders Hammar wrote:
> Did we really decide/settle on that?
> Having a four digit version will not play well with most (all?) tools that
> list Maven artifacts. Just an ui issue, but still.
>
> /Anders (mobile
On 31 January 2015 at 01:33, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> As every ASF project, Apache Maven regularly reports to the Apache board about
> the status of the project. Our latest report (January 21st, 2014) is shown
> below:
>
> Apache Maven is a widely-used project build tool, targeting mainly Java
> dev
ok, fine
thanks
Le samedi 31 janvier 2015 06:16:29 Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> I'm not releasing an RC build. I will do more what I described previously
> where we'll have a stream of releases 3.2.6.01-f9ea0d, 3.2.6.02-1c46616 and
> the one deemed ready for public distribution will be the official 3
Did we really decide/settle on that?
Having a four digit version will not play well with most (all?) tools that
list Maven artifacts. Just an ui issue, but still.
/Anders (mobile)
Den 31 jan 2015 12:18 skrev "Jason van Zyl" :
> I'm not releasing an RC build. I will do more what I described previo
I'm not releasing an RC build. I will do more what I described previously where
we'll have a stream of releases 3.2.6.01-f9ea0d, 3.2.6.02-1c46616 and the one
deemed ready for public distribution will be the official 3.2.6.
On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:22 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> yes, great, this pe
Hi Tibor & Andreas,
Surefire855, it was only a remark - I was not touching it.
New pull request attached - https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/84
Regards,
NW
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Hi Norbert,
>
> Definitely we should make notes about Maven 2 limitation
GitHub user norbertwnuk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/84
SUREFIRE-1136 Mark surefire.forkNumber feature as not compatible with maven
2.x, unit test cleanup.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull htt
12 matches
Mail list logo
