Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

B On 16.12.2014, at 08:41, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > B > > On 12/15/2014 11:39 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: >> After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing. >> >> This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins. >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (w

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > As "cute" as "Shutgun" might seem, for some unspecified definition of > "cute", I am sick of hearing about any kind of gun... > > http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-school-shootings-sandy-hook-20141211-story.html Same here.

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

B On 12/15/2014 11:39 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing. > > This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an > extension until I send a message saying

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

All votes count. PMC votes are special for binary releases due to legal requirements. This is a community issue, so everyone is welcome On Tuesday, December 16, 2014, Gary Gregory wrote: > I guess I should VOTE B, but I am not on the PMC so I am not sure which > votes count. > > Gary > > On Mon,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Assembly Plugin version 2.5.3

+1 Regards, Hervé Le samedi 13 décembre 2014 10:33:24 Kristian Rosenvold a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved 21 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=20790&styleName=Htm > l&projectId=11126 > > This release is mostly focused on regressions and minor issues in the > 2.5.X

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

B On 15 December 2014 at 21:39, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing. > > This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an >

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

I guess I should VOTE B, but I am not on the PMC so I am not sure which votes count. Gary On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You raise a fair point, and for that reason I am changing my vote to > > B > > On 15 December 2014 at 13:15, Ga

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Ant Plugin version 2.4

Hi, We solved 10 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11124&version=15977 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MANT%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC Staging

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

B 2014-12-16 0:26 GMT+02:00 Stephen Connolly : > > You raise a fair point, and for that reason I am changing my vote to > > B > > On 15 December 2014 at 13:15, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > As "cute" as "Shutgun" might seem, for some unspecified definition of > > "cute", I am sick of hearing about

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

You raise a fair point, and for that reason I am changing my vote to B On 15 December 2014 at 13:15, Gary Gregory wrote: > > As "cute" as "Shutgun" might seem, for some unspecified definition of > "cute", I am sick of hearing about any kind of gun... > > http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nation

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

B Arnaud On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Dan Rollo wrote: > > A > > -Dan > > On 15/12/2014, at 9:39 PM, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing. > > > > This second vote will be a straight and simple majo

Re: Releases, Continuous Delivery and the Future

Jason, thanks for taking the time to write this up. It is a good read. One extra tidbit I'd like to discussion is this. When I recommended we burn the version when the vote/build fails, I wasn't expecting we would move the fixed issues to the new version. Let's not do that. I find that confusing b

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

A -Dan On 15/12/2014, at 9:39 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing. > > This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an > extension until I send a mes

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.2.5

Hi, +1 from me... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 12/14/14 7:00 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, Time to release Maven 3.2.5! Here is a link to Jira with 22 issues resolved: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=20819 Staging repo: https://repository.apach

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

A Sent from my iPhone On 15/12/2014, at 9:39 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing. > > This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an > extension unt

Infrastructure Information

Hi to all, on Wednesday 21:00 UTC Erebus Server will be taken down which results in downtime (estimated for around 45 minutes) for several services... * Confluence Wiki * repository.apache.org and other services as well... So don't be astonished.. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise -

RE: Releases, Continuous Delivery and the Future

If you need "outside opinions", I would be happy to participate in that meeting... :-) -- Robert Patrick VP, FMW Platform Engineering, Oracle Corporation 7460 Warren Pkwy, Ste. 300 Office: +1.972.963.2872 Frisco, TX 75034, USA Mobile: +1.469.556.9450 Professional Oracle WebLogic

Re: Releases, Continuous Delivery and the Future

You're not missing anything. The integration we've written essentially replaces much of the internal resolution mechanism with support on the repository side. We currently do not use SNAPSHOTs and we do use ranges for a team of 1500+ developers. It will all be open source but we're not ready to

Re: dev Digest 15 Dec 2014 13:39:16 -0000 Issue 5782

Dan, can you please vote on the actual thread and not the digest? On 15 December 2014 at 14:59, Dan Rollo wrote: > > A > > -Dan > > > > On Dec 15, 2014, at 8:39 AM, dev-digest-h...@maven.apache.org wrote: > > > > From: Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com>> > > Date: December 15, 2014 at

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

A - Shotgun Stephen Connolly wrote on 15.12.2014 02:39: > After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing. > > This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an > extension until I send a message

Re: dev Digest 15 Dec 2014 13:39:16 -0000 Issue 5782

A -Dan > On Dec 15, 2014, at 8:39 AM, dev-digest-h...@maven.apache.org wrote: > > From: Martijn Dashorst > > Date: December 15, 2014 at 8:34:04 AM EST > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl" > To: Maven Users List mailto:us...@mave

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

B as in "Dont care" Kristian "shotgun owl for president" 2014-12-15 13:42 GMT+01:00 Kristian Rosenvold : > A > > 2014-12-15 13:34 GMT+01:00 Graham Leggett : >> On 15 Dec 2014, at 12:39 PM, Stephen Connolly >> wrote: >> >>> After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing. >>> >>> T

Re: Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

I don't imagine this is an open vote, but I lurk and agree: shotgun is very off putting. B On 15 December 2014 at 13:33, Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote: >> As "cute" as "Shutgun" might seem, for some unspecified definition of >> "cute", I am sick of hearing about any kind of gun... >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.2.5

At first glance that does not look like a valid OSGi version: http://www.osgi.org/javadoc/r4v43/core/org/osgi/framework/Version.html In Tycho something like: 1.0-SNAPSHOT in the POM and 1.0.qualifier in the MANIFEST.MF would turn into something like: 1.0.497f8c4709bea5e3656572cf52462c1b259

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

B Martijn On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:27 PM, David Hoffer wrote: > B > > -Dave > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:22 AM, wrote: >> >> B >> >> Cody Fyler >> Lending Grid Build Team >> G=Lending Grid Builds >> (515) – 441 - 0814 >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.

Re: Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

> As "cute" as "Shutgun" might seem, for some unspecified definition of > "cute", I am sick of hearing about any kind of gun... > http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-school-shootings-sandy-hook-20141211-story.html Thank you so much for bringing this up. I am personally disgusted abo

Re: Releases, Continuous Delivery and the Future

On Dec 15, 2014, at 1:49 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > I somehow think we need to decide if we want to change anything :) > We certainly don't have to. I'm describing a system that's been implemented and it's working but I'm not expecting as a certainty that it's integrated here. I believ

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

As "cute" as "Shutgun" might seem, for some unspecified definition of "cute", I am sick of hearing about any kind of gun... http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-school-shootings-sandy-hook-20141211-story.html Gary On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Jeroen Hoek wrote: > > B > > 2014-1

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:39:27 + Stephen Connolly wrote: A thanks, tony. > After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing. > > This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an > extension u

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

A 2014-12-15 13:34 GMT+01:00 Graham Leggett : > On 15 Dec 2014, at 12:39 PM, Stephen Connolly > wrote: > >> After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing. >> >> This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins. >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with th

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

On 15 Dec 2014, at 12:39 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing. > > This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an > extension until I send a message sa

Re: Releases, Continuous Delivery and the Future

Sorry for the noise and maybe I am just being stupid but... This is a constant source of pain for us as Maven users when we do not use snapshots. The real problem is that once you go down his path, Maven seems to really only have two choices when you set your dependency version to 2.5.3: 1.) i

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

B Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > A > > On 15 December 2014 at 10:39, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > After the run-o

AW: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

B -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 15. Dezember 2014 11:39 An: Maven Users List; Maven Developers List Betreff: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl" After the run-off round, we are left with two nam

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

B /Anders On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing. > > This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the pote

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

A On 15 December 2014 at 10:39, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing. > > This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an >

[VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing. This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an extension until I send a message saying that the polls are closed) There will be no discussion in this

[RESULT] [VOTE] Run-off for mascot's name

On the basis of any preference expressed: H: has 12 preferences expressed K: has 10 preferences expressed B: has 6 preferences expressed I declare the winners of the run-off to be H and K (i.e. "Shotgun" and "The Maven Owl") I will now start a vote thread to decide the overall winner (And hopef

Re: [VOTE] Run-off for mascot's name

At this point we have: A with 2x1st pref, 1x2nd pref (or 3 any pref votes) B with 5x1st pref, 1x2nd pref (or 6 any pref votes) H with 10x1st pref, 2x2nd pref (or 12 any pref votes) K with 4x1st pref, 5x2nd pref, 1x3rd pref (or 10 any pref votes) The lowest by any measure is A, so I will eliminate

Re: [VOTE] Run-off for mascot's name

A had no transfers to promote On 15 December 2014 at 10:28, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > At this point we have: > > A with 2x1st pref, 1x2nd pref (or 3 any pref votes) > B with 5x1st pref, 1x2nd pref (or 6 any pref votes) > H with 10x1st pref, 2x2nd pref (or 12 an

Re: [VOTE] Run-off for mascot's name

In Round 3, E only has 2nd preference votes (I could have eliminated E earlier, but given the transfers it makes no difference to the result...) I will now eliminate E and promote its preferences (which all go to K by the way) On 15 December 2014 at 10:21, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno..

Re: [VOTE] Run-off for mascot's name

D has less second preferences that the other elimination candidate: A (based on votes of any preference) so eliminating D and promoting it's preferences accordingly (IOW Michael O's 2nd pref for A now becomes a 1st pref for A in round 3) On 15 December 2014 at 10:16, Stephen Connolly < stephen.ala

Re: [VOTE] Run-off for mascot's name

After counting the 21 votes cast. I am eliminating C, F, G, and L as there is less than 3 votes between them and redistributing those votes would not affect the position of any of C, F, G or L Round 2 of the count will now proceed On 15 December 2014 at 10:04, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conn

Re: [VOTE] Run-off for mascot's name

This poll is now closed. I will now proceed to count the votes and votes received after this mail is sent will be excluded from the final count On 9 December 2014 at 10:52, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is a run-off vote to select the top two options for o

Re: Releases, Continuous Delivery and the Future

On 15 December 2014 at 01:29, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > Hi, > > The discussion keeps resurfacing about how we deal with failed releases so > I'll summarize how I think it should ultimately be done as a starting point. > > I'll go over the cases we've encountered thus far: > > 1) The user case prefe