I had a look through a few projects, and it would seem to me like
"know" 90% of the committers because they are all associated with
maven, most of them are also active. There's a further 5 or so
committers that are well known community folks that we could probably
get hold of easily. It would appea
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-wagon/pull/12
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-wagon/pull/13
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
For everything significant where significant is defined as more than 200 lines.
I don't think we have any of those, and if we actually expunged from the source
classes we don't actually use we're definitely safe.
On Sep 3, 2014, at 3:27 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> If _everyone_ is present an
If _everyone_ is present and accounted for, I agree.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Yes, I think everyone is making this 10x more complicated than it is. Our
> existing CLAs apply. If you wrote the code, you can contribute it. For
> modello, plexus-utils, and plexus-clas
Yes, I think everyone is making this 10x more complicated than it is. Our
existing CLAs apply. If you wrote the code, you can contribute it. For modello,
plexus-utils, and plexus-classworlds we're covered as far as I can tell.
On Sep 3, 2014, at 2:44 PM, Kristian Rosenvold
wrote:
> To my best
To my best knowledge, *all* of the substantial contributors to all the
plexus repositories I have seen are available to us, most of them are
PMC's or emeritus, and still "around" in some fashion or another.
Could we make all of them submit some kind of written submission to
the ASF ? I would actua
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 9/2/14 11:18 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> Gang, doesn't the board of the ASF have very strong, negative,
>> feelings about ASF PMC's controlling and maintaining code outside of
>> the ASF?
>
>
> Is there any evident abo
On Wednesday, 3 September 2014, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> Actually, that's really bad news.
>
> When a person creates a work, the copyright belongs to the person,
> unless that person enters into a contract to assign the contract to
> someone else.
>
> When I see 'Copyright (c) Codehaus', I a
Hi,
On 9/2/14 11:18 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Gang, doesn't the board of the ASF have very strong, negative,
feelings about ASF PMC's controlling and maintaining code outside of
the ASF?
Is there any evident about that ? any official statement about that from
ASF Board ?
> I confess that
Actually, that's really bad news.
When a person creates a work, the copyright belongs to the person,
unless that person enters into a contract to assign the contract to
someone else.
When I see 'Copyright (c) Codehaus', I assume that this is legit,
and that (a) Codehaus is a legal entity, and
On Wednesday, 3 September 2014, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 3 September 2014, Hervé BOUTEMY
> wrote:
> >
> >> is there something about IP process for such established code?
> >>
> >> I see something like 10 components (we
This weeks link:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/113247990055413254822/events/ckot923l5os14kh73e8ppv2o4j8
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
http://twitter.com/takari_io
-
13 matches
Mail list logo
