Re: Maven Developer Hangout - 2014-07-24

The hangout was just meant to talk about anything people wanted to talk about, we just happened to start with POM 5.0. We have had a range of topics. If it's something related to Maven it's fair game. On Jul 25, 2014, at 12:40 AM, Mark Derricutt wrote: > I believe the original hangouts were m

Re: Maven Developer Hangout - 2014-07-24

What do you mean "but recently it seems anyone can say it is a Maven Developer Hangout" ? There has only been the one series of hangouts. Where anyone can talk about any topic related to Maven, which is what has transpired thus far. The update Manfred posted was all about Maven so I'm confused

Re: Maven Developer Hangout - 2014-07-24

Yes, they are related to Maven. I do not recall a discussion we've had about anything not Maven related. On Jul 24, 2014, at 11:50 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: > Question about these hangouts... are they about anything related to Maven? > I thought these were to focus on 4.0 enhancements. Perhaps

Re: Maven Developer Hangout - 2014-07-24

These hangouts are for people involved in Maven related development be that Maven itself, plugins or other related tools. Jason/Takari is organizing these for the Maven community and they are open to anyone willing to speak up and contribute. I am not sure what you are talking about when you sa

Re: Maven Developer Hangout - 2014-07-24

I believe the original hangouts were more focused on the 4.0 POM as that was the primary topic of discussion going on in dev@ - plotting the course forward for Maven 4.x and beyond. But as with everything - once you open the forum for discussion, other things can, and invariably will come in b

Re: Maven Developer Hangout - 2014-07-24

Agree! I thought I saw Jason doing these, but recently it seems anyone can say it is a Maven Developer Hangout. I am confused about this most recent update. On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: > Question about these hangouts... are they about anything related to Maven? > I tho

Re: Maven Developer Hangout - 2014-07-24

Question about these hangouts... are they about anything related to Maven? I thought these were to focus on 4.0 enhancements. Perhaps I misunderstood; it looks this week's topics were mostly private company infrastructure stuff. Cheers, Paul On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Manfred Moser wrote

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM Version 1.9.1

+1 (binding) On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > It isn't the work of a minute. > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> really no one...? >> >> Kind regards >> Karl-Heinz Marbaise >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> only one binding vote is needed ;-

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM Version 1.9.1

It isn't the work of a minute. On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > really no one...? > > Kind regards > Karl-Heinz Marbaise > >> Hi, >> >> only one binding vote is needed ;-) >> >> On 7/21/14 11:51 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We solved

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM Version 1.9.1

Hi, really no one...? Kind regards Karl-Heinz Marbaise Hi, only one binding vote is needed ;-) On 7/21/14 11:51 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, We solved 13 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10527&version=19623 There are still a couple of issues le

Re: Maven Developer Hangout - 2014-07-24

Hi, unfortunately i couldn't make it and Manfred yes i'm enjoining a really good sunset at north sea at the end of my vacation...but i took the recorded one... On 7/24/14 11:35 PM, Manfred Moser wrote: Hi all! We had another interesting and productive developer hangout today. The followin

Re: Maven Developer Hangout - 2014-07-24

Le vendredi 25 juillet 2014 00:13:48 Robert Scholte a écrit : > Hi, > > sorry I couldn't make it today, though I've listened to the livestream. > > One extra remark regarding the checkstyle enforcements: when I mentioned > the pre-commit-hook my idea was *not* to let that apply checkstyle, but >

Re: Maven Developer Hangout - 2014-07-24

Wiki page for referencing all the hangouts and summaries/discussions started [1] Feel free to improve Regards, Hervé [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+Development+Hangout Le jeudi 24 juillet 2014 23:35:46 Manfred Moser a écrit : > Hi all! > > We had another interesti

Re: Maven Developer Hangout - 2014-07-24

Hi, sorry I couldn't make it today, though I've listened to the livestream. One extra remark regarding the checkstyle enforcements: when I mentioned the pre-commit-hook my idea was *not* to let that apply checkstyle, but that it doesn't accept a commit if it doesn't follow the convention. Th

Re: Early Access builds for JDK 9 b21, JDK 8u20 b21 are available on java.net

Hi Rory, Based on https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOMPILER-228 I've created JI-9013725. thanks, Robert Op Fri, 04 Jul 2014 11:35:00 +0200 schreef Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland : Hi Robert,Kristian, Early Access builds for JDK 9 b21 and JDK 8

Maven Developer Hangout - 2014-07-24

Hi all! We had another interesting and productive developer hangout today. The following topics were discussed and raised: - new release of progressive-organization-pom available https://github.com/simpligility/progressive-organization-pom - new release of Android Maven Plugin 3.9.0-rc.3 http

Re: Apachecon in budapest ?

good news: after some negociations, I now can say that *I'll be there!* Let's plan some meeting and hope we can get something shareable with the whole Maven devs community Regards, Hervé Le jeudi 12 juin 2014 07:38:18 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : > I'd like to try to attend too: not sure I'll be ab

Re: Maven Developer Hangout

Le jeudi 24 juillet 2014 09:20:40 Paul Benedict a écrit : > I know this was brought up before. I agree with whoever said this: the > hangout videos are like the Apache conference and it's not easy to get a > summary. Any thoughts to someone volunteering as a secretary and creating > bullet-point li

Re: Maven Developer Hangout

We will definitely run the event. I got at least 3 topics to cover. manfred Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote on 24.07.2014 08:55: > Hi, > > I would like to attend... > > Kind regards > Karl-Heinz > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Maven Developer Hangout

Hi, I would like to attend... Kind regards Karl-Heinz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: Maven Developer Hangout

I know this was brought up before. I agree with whoever said this: the hangout videos are like the Apache conference and it's not easy to get a summary. Any thoughts to someone volunteering as a secretary and creating bullet-point lists on the wiki? I just want to know what was generally discussed

Maven Developer Hangout

I can't make the hangout today, but Emily will start it as per usual and folks can talk about whatever they wish. Someone else can run the discussion. I think it's good to always have the forum every week and if there's nothing to talk about people can leave. Thanks, Jason ---

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven SCM Version 1.9.1

Hi, only one binding vote is needed ;-) On 7/21/14 11:51 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, We solved 13 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10527&version=19623 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/issues/?jql=project%20

org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.ArtifactResolver ignores packaging when resolving artifacts since mvn 3.1.1

Hi all mates, I faced today a strange issue(?) that I experienced with Maven 3.1.1 and 3.2.2: as per subject, org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.ArtifactResolver ignores packaging when resolving artifacts, I mean that if a request com.acme:acme-commons:pom:1.7.0 the ArtifactResolver componnet tri