Hi,
You introduced the idea a couple of ago on this list already, and IIRC, one
main feedback question was why you don't use JUnit's Rules concept for
this. I can think of a couple of arguments to rather use Rules instead of
the extension in surefire, but I'd like to know your reasoning to go this
I found a small bug with 3.2.2 and the plugin test harness. While writing up
release notes I tested a couple more projects and found the issue. Not a show
stopper but was investigating which is why the release is taking longer than I
expected.
On Jun 24, 2014, at 7:08 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Upgrade my git to 1.8.x fixes. TCK test failure probably to my change at
maven-scm-test's StatusCommandTckTest. This only happen for gitexe, but not
jgit
looking...
-D
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
> Hi Hervé
>
> *Thanks for the response, does your gitexe pass TCK test?*
>
Hi,
I have some thoughts about that...first as far as i can remember we had
a discussion about the same subject a longer time ago...
Furthermore by definition a unit test is just a unit which is very small
and should not have any relationships to anything outside (exception:
mocking)...
So
Hi,
You sure created a big patch! I am sure there is more than one way to solve
this problem. Enhancing the plugin is one way, but is that really the right
way to universalize the functionality? I don't know. Maybe others will
agree with you. My first thoughts would be that the external process th
Hi Hervé
*Thanks for the response, does your gitexe pass TCK test?*
*-D*
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
> no problem on my machine:
> Linux, git 1.9.1
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le mardi 24 juin 2014 01:20:31 Dan Tran a écrit :
> > In another words, are you able to get
Hi,
I am an intern at Google. The first step of my internship project is to add
the ability to Maven to automatically rerun failing tests a few times, to
see if they ever pass in any of the reruns. It is useful because in many
cases a test fails because it is flaky, not because there is a bug in t
GitHub user qingzhouluo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/40
Add rerunFailingTests option for maven surefire to rerun failing tests i...
Add rerunFailingTests option for maven surefire to rerun failing tests
immediately after they fail. Each single
no problem on my machine:
Linux, git 1.9.1
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 24 juin 2014 01:20:31 Dan Tran a écrit :
> In another words, are you able to get maven-scm-provider-gitexe built and
> test passed?
>
> Thanks
>
> -D
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
> > Hi I am running i
it was already done
and really easy: you already know how to stage, then stage-deploy is just "mvn
scm-publish:publish-scm" away
and release is just a "svn cp" command
really not that hard
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 24 juin 2014 07:08:53 Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> The vote passed with the
Hi,
We solved 13 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11211&version=16516
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MCHANGELOG%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
Sta
Looks like the test fails on my change, but it not the same failures.
I will looking into it, will need to upgrade my git
-D
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Robert Scholte
wrote:
> According to https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-
> scm/changes and #847 being stable they
Hi Robert,
many thanks.
Kind regards
Karl-Heinz Marbaise
On 6/24/14 6:19 PM, Robert Scholte wrote:
Both done,
Robert
Op Tue, 24 Jun 2014 12:25:55 +0200 schreef Karl Heinz Marbaise
:
Hi,
can someone of the pmc members be so kind to push the artifacts into
the distro area and add it to board
According to
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-scm/changes and
#847 being stable they should succeed.
IIRC you should at least use version 1.8, although I'm not sure.
Robert
Op Tue, 24 Jun 2014 10:20:31 +0200 schreef Dan Tran :
In another words, are you able to get ma
Both done,
Robert
Op Tue, 24 Jun 2014 12:25:55 +0200 schreef Karl Heinz Marbaise
:
Hi,
can someone of the pmc members be so kind to push the artifacts into the
distro area and add it to board report?
Many thanks in advance.
Kind regards
Karl-Heinz Marbaise
On 6/24/14 12:20 PM, Karl Hei
Hi,
The vote passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Jason van Zyl, Hervé Boutemy, Olivier Lamy, Arnaud Héritier,
Robert Scholte
+1 (non-binding): Karl-Heinz Marbaise, Mirko Friedenhagen, Mark Derricutt, Igor
Fedorenko, Baptiste Mathus
I will finish the writeup of the release notes and
Hervé,
IMO tree is a completely different beast, to be honest having info about
the ancestors seems (now) so basic to me that I would even have this to be
a core feature. No remote lookups are used here whereas tree needs to do a
complete dependency resolution.
Regards
Mirko
--
Sent from my mobi
Hi,
can someone of the pmc members be so kind to push the artifacts into the
distro area and add it to board report?
Many thanks in advance.
Kind regards
Karl-Heinz Marbaise
On 6/24/14 12:20 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the
Apache
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the
Apache Maven JAR Plugin, version 2.5.
This plugin provides the capability to build jars.
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-jar-plugin/
You should specify the version in your project's plugin configuration:
org.apache.maven.
In another words, are you able to get maven-scm-provider-gitexe built and
test passed?
Thanks
-D
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
>
> Hi I am running into test failures
>
> Linux: ( git version 1.7.9.5)
>
> Failed tests:
>
> GitCheckInCommandNoBranchTest.testCheckinNoBranch:7
20 matches
Mail list logo
