On Mar 25, 2014, at 7:31 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Interesting.
>
> What is the plan about org.sonatype.plexus:plexus-build-api already
> integrated
> in some plugins?
>
We consider it deficient for properly tracking stale outputs and being
fine-grained enough to make an in
The scope of plexus-build-api is strictly limited to eclipse
integration. As such, it does not provide enough fidelity to implement
proper command line incremental build. In fact, even inside eclipse
plexus-build-api does not correctly handle stale output cleanup, so we
have to do Project/Clean af
Hi Jason,
Interesting.
What is the plan about org.sonatype.plexus:plexus-build-api already integrated
in some plugins?
Given the expected large diffusion of this API, wouldn't it be wise to put it
at Apache?
or Eclipse?
(I won't rehash previous discussions about freedom and preferences from ea
Under requirements [1], we're stating the following:
"No minimum requirement. On Windows, Windows NT and above or Cygwin is
required for the startup scripts. Tested on Windows XP, Fedora Core and Mac
OS X."
What exactly are we trying to say with the "On Windows, Windows NT and
above or Cygwin is
Hi,
For those who are interested in incremental builds we, at Takari, have released
a general purpose incremental build API with an initial focus on Maven. We've
created a short, high-level description of the framework[1] and we've opened up
our Git repository with the code[2]. We also have a s
Hi,
Please try the latest 2.10-SNAPSHOT version of the plugin.
It has a fix for an issue that sounds similar to yours.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Behrooz N wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to generate a JIRA report using Changes Plugin. I've managed to
> re-produce a situation which is contradi
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Baptiste Mathus wrote:
> FWIW, I'm aware it's easily feasible to add that checksum validation in a
> plugin, but you'll still have to repeat the coordinates.
> And that very thing was my point: I don't think having to repeat those
> coordinates to add metadata is
Nahh.. you misinterpret what I am saying (probably a fault of my
communication)... when it is not a day I have taken as vacation time I will
explain in more detail
On 25 March 2014 08:55, Baptiste Mathus wrote:
> FWIW, I'm aware it's easily feasible to add that checksum validation in a
> plugin
FWIW, I'm aware it's easily feasible to add that checksum validation in a
plugin, but you'll still have to repeat the coordinates.
And that very thing was my point: I don't think having to repeat those
coordinates to add metadata is great.
Not even saying this *must* go in modelVersion 5, I just w
