Hello Karl-Heinz,
I thought you said appassembler would put configs wrongly into
src/main/config instead of src/config. Now it seems the stuff is included
in the artifact. IMO stuff going into the artifact should be beneath
src/main while configs for e.g. plugins should go to src/config (say
check
Hi,
Did you change from src/main/config to src/config on purpose?
In this case (i.e. when using the appassembler plugin) it really
should be src/main/config, because the contents of that directory will
end up in the main artifact. Similar to resources which might not be
required at compile time,
Hi Mirko,
so someone should maybe file an issue in the
appassembler-maven-plugin, I think the layout you provided is
reasonable.
Why for the appassembler-maven-plugin ? It currently uses src/config ?
Should appassembler-maven-plugin stop using src/config ?
Hm...
Kind regards
Karl-Heinz Marb
Hi Mirko,
> Karl-Heinz,
so someone should maybe file an issue in the
appassembler-maven-plugin, I think the layout you provided is
reasonable.
done so.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNGSITE-195
Kind regards
Karl-Heinz Marbaise
Regards Mirko
--
http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/
Karl-Heinz,
so someone should maybe file an issue in the
appassembler-maven-plugin, I think the layout you provided is
reasonable.
Regards Mirko
--
http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/
https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen)
https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Dennis Lundberg, Robert Scholte, Hervé Boutemy
+1 (non binding): Michael Osipov, Karl Heinz Marbaise
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 10
Hi,
+1 (non binding)
Tested with Maven 3.2.1, Maven 3.1.1, Maven 3.0.5
No problem.
Kind regards
Karl-Heinz Marbaise
On 3/11/14 9:18 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi,
We solved 10 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11140&styleName=Html&version=19131
There are st
+1 (non binding).
Tested (maven-surefire-plugin) with several projects
Maven 3.2.1
Maven 3.1.0
Maven 3.1.1
Tested (maven-failsafe-plugin) with a few projects.
Maven 3.2.1
Maven 3.1.1
Tested (maven-surefire-report-plugin) with a single project.
Maven 3.2.1
On 3/12/14 10:52 PM, Andreas Gudian
Hello Dennis,
> src/main/config is used as the default value for configuration files
in appassembler-maven-plugin @Mojo.
Ah damn...Just forgot about that...;-)
Thanks for that hint.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
Hi,
On 3/9/14 9:02 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise w
Hi,
so based on the discussion we can conclude the result as follows:
src/main
* are files required during compile time (production)
src/main/java
src/main/resources
src/main/filters
src/test
* are files required during test time (unit testing; based on naming
s
Hi all,
When releasing the Checkstyle Plugin I noticed that our setup for
generating and emailing the announcement using the Changes Plugin is
broken. See these issues for details:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-280
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-292
http://jira.codehaus.org/br
+1
Regards,
Hervé
Le mercredi 12 mars 2014 22:52:21 Andreas Gudian a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> long ago since we released the last Surefire version. It's about time we
> change that ;-).
>
> We solved 16 issues:
> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541&version=19
> 536
>
>
+1
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 11 mars 2014 21:18:10 Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 10 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11140&styleName=H
> tml&version=19131
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Is
+1
RAT: only approved licenses
'mvn verify -Prun-its': build success
SHA1: correct
Site: ok
Robert
Op Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:20:57 +0100 schreef Dennis Lundberg
:
+1 from me
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Dennis Lundberg
wrote:
Hi,
We solved 10 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/
Usually this means pc'er running out of entropy. Try installing randomsound
K
14. Mars 2014 09:04 skrev "Vishal Kumar Gupta"
følgende:
> Hi Team,
> OS - Ubuntu 12.04 TLS
>
> Issue:-
> 1) maven version - 3.2.1 - when i run plugin maven-jar-plugin:2.4 it
> completes in ~15 Minutes.
> 2) maven vers
Op Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:25:59 +0100 schreef Baptiste Mathus
:
2014-03-13 19:19 GMT+01:00 Robert Scholte :
To say it in your own words: IMHO I think you're wrong here ;)
Version policy is about calculating the next version based on an input
version.
These are valid examples:
default policy:
g
Hi Robert,
yes I agree, while making my prototype - it will be opensourced, by
the way - I also realised that my Policy implementation is the wrong
Maven phase: when asking for the next release version, it is supposed
that current doesn't exist yet (unless someone publishes the SNAPSHOT,
even loca
Hi Simone,
I think what you want is a way to make clear what kind of release it will
be: major, minor, bugfix/micro.
That's something which can be added to the request and looks reasonable
for all policies. I'm not sure if an enum is correct here, any founded
suggestion is welcome.
However,
2014-03-13 19:19 GMT+01:00 Robert Scholte :
> To say it in your own words: IMHO I think you're wrong here ;)
>
> Version policy is about calculating the next version based on an input
> version.
> These are valid examples:
> default policy:
> getReleaseVersion("1-SNAPSHOT") = 1
> getReleaseVersion
Hi Rob,
thanks a lot for the detailed feedback, very appreciated :)
I just realise I didn't pass you enough informations to better
understand the new context we are working on: in the OSGi world, aside
the odd-even policy, we would like to wrap BND[1] APis which allow
compare two bundles and unde
+1 from me
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 10 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11140&styleName=Html&version=19131
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.j
+1
Just in time for jdk8 ga :)
K
14. Mars 2014 00:44 skrev "Olivier Lamy" følgende:
> +1
> Tested on few projects.
>
> Thanks!
> Olivier
>
>
> On 13 March 2014 08:52, Andreas Gudian wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > long ago since we released the last Surefire version. It's about time we
> > change tha
22 matches
Mail list logo
