I want this release to be Java 5 compatible.
PMD 5.1 requires Java 6, even though it is not mentioned in their release
notes.
--
Dennis Lundberg
Den 11 mar 2014 21:46 skrev "Michael Osipov" :
> +1, but why not upgrade to 5.1 (MPMD-182) first?
>
> --
+1
On 9 March 2014 09:49, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 15 issues:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11127&styleName=Html&version=19723
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=tr
already done in http://svn.apache.org/r1575724[1]
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 11 mars 2014 06:17:34 Benson Margulies a écrit :
> The current maven-release-plugin?
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
> > I'm going to release maven parent POM in a few days
> >
> > please ever
no problem for me on this one
if someone creates a new git repository, it would be nice to create a Maven
root git repository with submodules definition to every actual git module
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 11 mars 2014 16:34:26 Baptiste Mathus a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Wondering, wouldn't maven-r
Hi,
I found that Maven 3.1.1 will try downloading the artifacts in parallel.
02:04:47 Downloading:
http://mycentral/content/repositories/central/javax/inject/javax.inject/1/javax.inject-1.pom
02:04:47 Downloaded:
http://mycentral/content/repositories/central/javax/inject/javax.inject/1/javax.
I just create an IT for sourceFileExcludes, and it fails. And I
debugged into it; the code dilligently scans the source directories,
but then does not use the resulting list files in the invocation of
javadoc. It just fires up javadoc on the entire src/main/java
directory.
Are any of the other con
Hi Dennis,
> +1 from me
I have verified that the problems Karl Heinz had with th ITs were
fixed by specifying the correct version in the POM of the IT. So the
error was not in the main plugin code, but rather in the configuration
of the IT.
Yes i can give now the +1 cause it's not really in t
Hi,
On 3/9/14 9:02 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
So based on the discussion could we go with the following:
/src/main
* are files required during compile time (production)
/src/test
* are files required during test time (unit testing; based on naming
schema we could also have integrat
+1, but why not upgrade to 5.1 (MPMD-182) first?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Hi,
We solved 10 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11140&styleName=Html&version=19131
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11140&status=1
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/co
Hi Michael,
You forgot: src/site.
No, cause it's already part of the default folder layout.
Kind Regards
Karl-Heinz Marbaise
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h..
Hi all,
Wondering, wouldn't maven-release be a good next candidate for a Git
migration?
I'm currently working locally with the maven-release github mirror, but
just had to checkout svn trunk to have a look at MRELEASE-431's robert's
current proposal (yes, I could've also git svn'ed it).
Cheers
Hi Robert,
+1 - given my current experimental implementation, I am convinced that
declaring the VersionPolicy as component is the way to go, so I can
even inject whatever I need in order to implement my policy to
increase versions :)
Thanks,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://
The current maven-release-plugin?
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> I'm going to release maven parent POM in a few days
>
> please everybody check that everything they want in this version is ok
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le mardi 11 mars 2014 07:36:20 hbout...@apache.org a
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Is there a candidate? Why don't you ask them what they are interested in,
> if there is one. Or do you have to come up with a project to attract
> someone?
>
yes, I got in touch with a student interested in GSoC. It's hard for
somebody very
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the update!
Rgds,Rory
On 10/03/2014 21:07, Robert Scholte wrote:
Hi Rory,
today I've released Maven Filtering 1.2, which doesn't suffer from
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8015656 anymore. Next step
will be upgrading the projects which depend on Maven Filterin
+1 from me
I have verified that the problems Karl Heinz had with th ITs were
fixed by specifying the correct version in the POM of the IT. So the
error was not in the main plugin code, but rather in the configuration
of the IT.
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We
I'm going to release maven parent POM in a few days
please everybody check that everything they want in this version is ok
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 11 mars 2014 07:36:20 hbout...@apache.org a écrit :
> Author: hboutemy
> Date: Tue Mar 11 07:36:19 2014
> New Revision: 1576206
>
> URL: http://svn
18 matches
Mail list logo
