Hi Michael,
>
Always use a relative path in the docs otherwise it could be
misinterpreted.
Of course you are right..
Kind regards
Karl-Heinz Marbaise
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional c
Github user ericdahl closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/32
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Hi Rory,
today I've released Maven Filtering 1.2, which doesn't suffer from
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8015656 anymore. Next step will
be upgrading the projects which depend on Maven Filtering.
regards,
Robert
Op Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:07:26 +0100 schreef Robert Scholte
:
H
Yeah that was one of the options to generate the archetype from my working
source. However, I release my archetype quite often and is really not
convenient to generate it every time and replace all the package names, and
xmls and class names etc. So I was hoping to get a better solution.
2014-03-
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Filtering, version 1.2
These Plexus components have been built from the filtering process/code in
Apache Maven Resources Plugin.
The goal is to provide a shared component for all plugins that need to
filter resourc
Github user yuppie-flu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/35
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
Hi Simone,
I still have to find a solution for the VersionParseException which can be
thrown with the current implementation of DefaultVersionInfo. I probably
have to add it to both methods of VersionPolicy
Your custom implementation will look something like:
@Component( role = VersionPoli
Is there a candidate? Why don't you ask them what they are interested in, if
there is one. Or do you have to come up with a project to attract someone?
On Mar 10, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
>> Realistically, look to p
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Realistically, look to plugins more than the core, if you ask me.
> There's the new not-quite-consumer-pom which might have a subtask. Or
> pick any of the common plugins and see what's out here.
>
I thought about that, but for GSoC it ne
Maybe contribute an detailed mode for a "maven profiler mode" feature
(using an eventspy for example). Say something that would display timing
informations about plugins executions durations and so on. Imo, this is
something everybody looks at when a build becomes longer.
I've seen implementations
Norbert,
You may want to attach your project here for others to look at:
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5597
On Mar 10, 2014, at 7:54 AM, Norbert Wnuk wrote:
> Hi All,
> I would like to get a clarification for Maven behavior when -pl (--projects)
> and -am (--also-make) / -amd (--also-m
Norbert,
MNG-5582 and MNG-5557 along with MNG-5578 are my attempts to start changing the
way the reactor can work. The default implementation is there and I have
another implementation I use. That's the impetus of the work.
MNG-5582 specifically aligns the build space with the resolution space.
Realistically, look to plugins more than the core, if you ask me.
There's the new not-quite-consumer-pom which might have a subtask. Or
pick any of the common plugins and see what's out here.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> There's a student interesting on doing the GSoC
There's a student interesting on doing the GSoC with the Maven project so I
was trying to figure out a meaningful project, not to small, not too large,
focusing on the top voted issues in jira.
But most of them are related to POM and profiles new features/improvements
which are not clearly defined/
Hi again Robert,
new APIs look reasonable and easily extensible to me, thanks for putting
effort on that!
I maybe missed something but I didn't notice how they are integrated in the
core module...
TIA all the best!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
Hi Robert!
amazing, I am having a look at it ASAP - anyway, DI sounds to be the way to
go :)
All the best!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Hi Simone,
>
> I've added a new module for Maven r
Hi Michael,
I do not want to enforce any real or precieved connection between a
phase and an assembly. As you say, there is no such thing for
assemblies. They are either triggered implicitly during the package
phase och explicitly using an execution.
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Michael Osip
Hi Robert,
I think we are talking past each other here. From what you are writing
we seem to agree that having an assembly for stuff in the src/test
directory doesn't make little sense.
I'm not opposed to changing things that are not working well. I'm just
trying to make sure that the change will
18 matches
Mail list logo