Cool. No dire rush.
On Feb 16, 2014, at 2:31 PM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> Jason, FYI I intend testing tomorrow AM (GMT). Expect my vote by noon/1pm
> GMT
>
> On Sunday, 16 February 2014, Mirko Friedenhagen
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>> Regards Mirko
>> --
>> http://illegalstateexception
Jason, FYI I intend testing tomorrow AM (GMT). Expect my vote by noon/1pm
GMT
On Sunday, 16 February 2014, Mirko Friedenhagen
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> Regards Mirko
> --
> http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/
> https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen)
> https
+1 (non-binding)
Regards Mirko
--
http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/
https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen)
https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Baptiste Mathus wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
>
> 2014-02-16 4:59 GMT+01:00 Mark
+1 (non-binding).
2014-02-16 4:59 GMT+01:00 Mark Derricutt :
> +1 here, seems to be working for all my projects.
>
> Don't seem to be getting the aether lock up either now, now I'm just
> suffering version-range hell of mixed feature branches there ( a hell of my
> own making ;p )
>
> Mark
>
>
>
+1
14. feb. 2014 01:32 skrev "Olivier Lamy" følgende:
> +1
>
> On 14 February 2014 02:14, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
> > We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August
> 2009.
> >
> > During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
> >
> > I would argu
+1 with a side remark. For those, who still rely on Maven 2 one should
first annouce an EOL roadmap like this:
1. Make the announcement
2. Release 2.2.2 (only one open ticket in JIRA which can me dismissed)
say 4 weeks later and announce that as the last version of 2.x
3. Encourage to switch t
Hi Jörg,
There's a little of confusion here: you're talking about the effective
pom, which is the fully resolved pom. However, you seem to be talking
about a consumer pom, as we started to call it since our thread about
model 5.0.0 [1]. Here we try to make a clear separation between the
i
+1
> Am 13.02.2014 um 16:14 schrieb Stephen Connolly
> :
>
> We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August 2009.
>
> During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release.
>
> I would argue that we should just therefore just declare Maven 2.x as end
> of
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August 2009.
>
> +1: Maven 2.x is end of life, I am not willing to act as release manager
> for this line of releases
Here's my +1.
Wayne
Am 04.02.2014 20:42, schrieb Robert Scholte:
Hi Jörg,
Hi Robert,
thanks for your response.
if we would change this for the maven-install-plugin, you'll hit it
again with the maven-deploy-plugin.
I know. The feature also used to work with the older version of
maven-deploy-plugin and this woul
Linking to podcasts and articles is intertresting, especially for those who
haven't done it before.
What this needs i a volunteer to do the task.
K
16. feb. 2014 04:07 skrev "Mark Derricutt" følgende:
> A really good podcast on the subject of migration a large project, and
> large team from
11 matches
Mail list logo
