Re: JDK 8 Build 121 & JDK 7 Update 60 build 02 are available on java.net

2014-01-17 Thread Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland
On 17/01/2014 17:17, Robert Scholte wrote: Hi Rory, I've just submitted the javadoc issue, Bug ID: 9009740 Hi Robert above can be tracked at : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032205 As for the performance issue , we need to compare apples with apples first, do let us know if ther

Re: JDK 8 Build 121 & JDK 7 Update 60 build 02 are available on java.net

2014-01-17 Thread Robert Scholte
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.1.x-with-maven-plugin-jdk-1.8/34/ this seems to be the latest valid run. A few plugins fail due the JDK8 related (hence, that's why this job was created). It took 6 hr 23 min. to finish this job. Stephen Connolly also me

Re: JDK 8 Build 121 & JDK 7 Update 60 build 02 are available on java.net

2014-01-17 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Rory, I've just submitted the javadoc issue, Bug ID: 9009740 Regarding the performance, here are some stats: https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.1.x-with-maven-plugin-jdk-1.7/ https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu1/systemInfo #146 Jan 12, 2014 9:58

Re: 3.2.0 Bug Scrub

2014-01-17 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, Regarding MNG-3124 (Inherit mailing lists from parent POM) and MNG-2807 (ciManagement from parent is not merging with children) See MavenModelMerger[1]. This class extends the ModelMerger[2], a class which is a handcrafted class as if it was generated by modello. It seems like Benjamin wa

Re: 3.2.0 Bug Scrub

2014-01-17 Thread Stephen Connolly
Done... we are now down to 17 issues still in scope for 3.2.0 On 17 January 2014 11:38, Stephen Connolly wrote: > OK, 4 days and no objections... these are being pushed out of scope for > 3.2.0 > > > On 13 January 2014 18:07, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The

Re: 3.2.0 Bug Scrub

2014-01-17 Thread Stephen Connolly
OK, 4 days and no objections... these are being pushed out of scope for 3.2.0 On 13 January 2014 18:07, Stephen Connolly wrote: > The following issues I proposed to move to 4.x. I have not heard anything > to the contrary... shall I pull the trigger on these? > >- http://jira.codehaus.org/br

New JDK 8 tool: jdeps

2014-01-17 Thread Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland
Hi All, Here's a blog from Erik Costlow on a new tool in JDK 8 that lets you analyze your code for dependencies on JDK internal APIs : https://blogs.oracle.com/java-platform-group/entry/closing_the_closed_apis Please let me know if you have any feedback - I'd be interested to hear if you use